IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v215y2008i1p262-271.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The feasibility of co-existence between conventional and genetically modified crops: Using machine learning to analyse the output of simulation models

Author

Listed:
  • Ivanovska, Aneta
  • Vens, Celine
  • Colbach, Nathalie
  • Debeljak, Marko
  • Džeroski, Sašo

Abstract

Simulation models are a commonly used tool for the study of the co-existence of conventional and genetically modified (GM) crops. Among other things, they allow us to investigate the effects of using different crop varieties, cropping systems and farming practices on the levels of adventitious presence of GM material in conventional crops. We propose to use machine learning methods to analyse the output of simulation models to learn co-existence rules that directly link the above mentioned causes and effects. The outputs of the GENESYS model, designed to study the co-existence of conventional and GM oilseed rape crops, were analysed by using the machine learning methods of regression tree induction and relational decision tree induction. Co-existence and adventitious presence of GM material were studied in several contexts, including gene flow between pairs of fields, the interactions of this process with farming practices (cropping systems), and gene flow in the context of an entire field plan. Accurate models were learned, which also make use of the relational aspects of a field plan, using information on the neighboring fields of a field, and the farming practices applied in it. The use of relational decision tree induction to analyse the results of simulation models is a novel approach and holds the promise of learning more general co-existence rules by allowing us to vary the target field within a chosen field plan, as well as to consider completely different field plans at the same time.

Suggested Citation

  • Ivanovska, Aneta & Vens, Celine & Colbach, Nathalie & Debeljak, Marko & Džeroski, Sašo, 2008. "The feasibility of co-existence between conventional and genetically modified crops: Using machine learning to analyse the output of simulation models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 215(1), pages 262-271.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:215:y:2008:i:1:p:262-271
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.02.031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380008001075
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.02.031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Debeljak, Marko & Squire, Geoff R. & Demšar, Damjan & Young, Mark W. & Džeroski, Sašo, 2008. "Relations between the oilseed rape volunteer seedbank, and soil factors, weed functional groups and geographical location in the UK," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 212(1), pages 138-146.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Douglas J. Warner & Kathleen A. Lewis, 2019. "Evaluation of the Risks of Contaminating Low Erucic Acid Rapeseed with High Erucic Rapeseed and Identification of Mitigation Strategies," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Debeljak, Marko & Squire, Geoffrey R. & Kocev, Dragi & Hawes, Cathy & Young, Mark W. & Džeroski, Sašo, 2011. "Analysis of time series data on agroecosystem vegetation using predictive clustering trees," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(14), pages 2524-2529.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:215:y:2008:i:1:p:262-271. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.