IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/deveco/v179y2026ics0304387825002275.html

Grassland certification, grazing behavior, and ecological consequences: Evidence from pastoral China

Author

Listed:
  • Shi, Xinjie
  • Huangfu, Bingyu
  • Zhang, Yan
  • Hu, Peinan
  • Gao, Xuwen

Abstract

This paper investigates the ecological consequences of grassland property rights reform in China, focusing on its relationship to economic incentives. Using remote sensing and plot-level data, we found that the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), a proxy for grassland ecology, decreased by 5.5 % in our study area following the implementation of the certification reform. Three potential mechanisms may explain these negative ecological outcomes. The first mechanism is the severe fragmentation of grasslands; contiguous large-scale grasslands were divided into smaller, fragmented plots after the reform, leading to increased grazing intensity. The second mechanism posits that economic incentives drive herders to expand their operations. This is closely linked to the third mechanism: the imperfection of grassland use rights. Due to incomplete property rights and frequent imperfections in grassland transfers, overgrazing primarily occurs on rented land rather than self-owned land, resulting in greater ecological degradation on rented plots. Additionally, while household-level aggregate livestock output increased and grassland rental markets became more efficient, we argue that, despite these anticipated improvements, property rights reforms have heightened the vulnerability of grassland ecology. These findings suggest that the trade-off between grassland sustainability and livestock productivity, driven by the grassland property rights reform, has impeded the development of more comprehensive strategies to mitigate grassland degradation.

Suggested Citation

  • Shi, Xinjie & Huangfu, Bingyu & Zhang, Yan & Hu, Peinan & Gao, Xuwen, 2026. "Grassland certification, grazing behavior, and ecological consequences: Evidence from pastoral China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:deveco:v:179:y:2026:i:c:s0304387825002275
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2025.103676
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304387825002275
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2025.103676?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Q15 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Land Ownership and Tenure; Land Reform; Land Use; Irrigation; Agriculture and Environment
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth
    • Q57 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Ecological Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:deveco:v:179:y:2026:i:c:s0304387825002275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/devec .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.