IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Adult recall of childhood psychological maltreatment: Definitional strategies and challenges

Listed author(s):
  • Baker, Amy J.L.
Registered author(s):

    This review paper was undertaken to compare legal definitions, conceptual definitions, and existing survey instruments of adult recall of childhood psychological maltreatment and to identify definitional challenges that remain. Fifteen measures were compared in order to determine whether the items on the measures captured all of the core constituent components of psychological abuse. Five key issues were identified for the field including, (1) lack of consistency in the term itself, (2) lack of consistency between legal and conceptual definitions, (3) lack of consistency between conceptual and operational definitions, (4) lack of clarity as to the role of witnessing domestic violence, and (5) lack of consistency in psychometric characteristics of the measures. Taken together these issues interfere with the ability of researchers to integrate findings across studies and to move the field forward. Suggestions for systematically addressing these issues are offered.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Children and Youth Services Review.

    Volume (Year): 31 (2009)
    Issue (Month): 7 (July)
    Pages: 703-714

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:31:y:2009:i:7:p:703-714
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:31:y:2009:i:7:p:703-714. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.