IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v180y2026ics019074092500564x.html

Echoes and ripples: a qualitative analysis of the relationship between social work supervision and home visits

Author

Listed:
  • Webb, Caroline M.
  • Wilkins, David

Abstract

The importance of supervision in social work is widely recognised, yet much remains unknown about the extent to which supervision influences social work practice and vice versa – and how. This qualitative study provides a detailed analysis of supervisory conversations and how they are reflected in subsequent practice conversations between social workers and people using services. Using an established framework for assessing the quality of supervision, we analysed five paired audio recordings of group supervision and home visits involving the same social worker and corresponding child and family. Through recursive abstraction, we identified key associations between the content and nature of discussions in supervision and discussions in the family home, as well as some notable discrepancies. These inconsistencies highlight the complexity of disentangling cause and effect within complex systems and suggest that the direction of influence may sometimes flow as much from practice to supervision as the other way around. Our findings contribute to the growing evidence base on the relationship between supervision and practice (in the form of home visits), underscoring the need for future research to include the perspectives of people using services and to explore other areas of social work practice and supervisory models.

Suggested Citation

  • Webb, Caroline M. & Wilkins, David, 2026. "Echoes and ripples: a qualitative analysis of the relationship between social work supervision and home visits," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:180:y:2026:i:c:s019074092500564x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108681
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019074092500564X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108681?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Munro, Eileen, 2004. "A simpler way to understand the results of risk assessment instruments," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(9), pages 873-883, September.
    2. Bostock, Lisa & Patrizo, Louis & Godfrey, Tessa & Forrester, Donald, 2019. "What is the impact of supervision on direct practice with families?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Bostock, Lisa & Patrizio, Louis & Godfrey, Tessa & Forrester, Donald, 2022. "Why does systemic supervision support practitioners’ practice more effectively with children and families?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    4. Carpenter, John & Webb, Caroline M. & Bostock, Lisa, 2013. "The surprisingly weak evidence base for supervision: Findings from a systematic review of research in child welfare practice (2000–2012)," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(11), pages 1843-1853.
    5. Bostock, Lisa & Patrizo, Louis & Godfrey, Tessa & Munro, Emily & Forrester, Donald, 2019. "How do we assess the quality of group supervision? Developing a coding framework," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 515-524.
    6. Eileen Munro, 2009. "Managing Societal and Institutional Risk in Child Protection," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(7), pages 1015-1023, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bostock, Lisa & Patrizio, Louis & Godfrey, Tessa & Forrester, Donald, 2022. "Why does systemic supervision support practitioners’ practice more effectively with children and families?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    2. Bostock, Lisa & Patrizo, Louis & Godfrey, Tessa & Forrester, Donald, 2019. "What is the impact of supervision on direct practice with families?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Caffrey, Louise & Browne, Freda, 2023. "The challenge of implementation in complex, adaptive child welfare systems: A realist synthesis of signs of safety," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    4. McCrae, Julie S. & Scannapieco, Maria & Obermann, Ann, 2015. "Retention and job satisfaction of child welfare supervisors," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 171-176.
    5. Aaltio, Elina, 2023. "Evaluating the effectiveness of the systemic practice model of children’s social care – A pilot study on child- and family-level outcomes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    6. Isokuortti, Nanne & Aaltio, Elina, 2020. "Fidelity and influencing factors in the Systemic Practice Model of children's social care in Finland," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    7. Shlonsky, Aron & Wagner, Dennis, 2005. "The next step: Integrating actuarial risk assessment and clinical judgment into an evidence-based practice framework in CPS case management," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 409-427, April.
    8. Bostock, Lisa & Patrizo, Louis & Godfrey, Tessa & Munro, Emily & Forrester, Donald, 2019. "How do we assess the quality of group supervision? Developing a coding framework," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 515-524.
    9. Dias, Daniela & Nunes, Rafaela & Coelho, Joana & Martinho, Gabriela & Santos, Anita, 2024. "Optimizing child protection systems: A systematic review of the literature on risk assessment practices," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    10. Mansell, James & Ota, Rissa & Erasmus, Ricus & Marks, Kip, 2011. "Reframing child protection: A response to a constant crisis of confidence in child protection," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(11), pages 2076-2086.
    11. Robichaud, Marie-Joëlle & Pullen Sansfaçon, Annie & Poirier, Marie-Andrée, 2020. "Decision making at substantiation in cases involving racialized families: Child protection workers’ perceptions of influential factors," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    12. Zinn, Andrew, 2015. "A typology of supervision in child welfare: Multilevel latent class and confirmatory analyses of caseworker–supervisor relationship type," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 98-110.
    13. Radey, Melissa & Stanley, Lauren, 2018. "“Hands on” versus “empty”: Supervision experiences of frontline child welfare workers," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 128-136.
    14. Ahn, Haksoon & Keyser, Daniel & Hayward-Everson, R. Anna, 2016. "A multi-level analysis of individual and agency effects on implementation of family-centered practice in child welfare," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 11-18.
    15. Harnett, Paul H., 2007. "A procedure for assessing parents' capacity for change in child protection cases," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(9), pages 1179-1188, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:180:y:2026:i:c:s019074092500564x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.