IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v156y2024ics0190740923005170.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Acceptability, feasibility and perceived effectiveness of online and remote mental health and wellbeing interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study with care-experienced young people, carers and professionals

Author

Listed:
  • Evans, Rhiannon
  • Cunningham, Emily
  • Stabler, Lorna
  • Vaughan, Rachael
  • Davies, Brittany
  • Cummings, Aimee
  • Boffey, Maria
  • Wooders, Charlotte
  • Mannay, Dawn

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic, and associated lockdowns, saw numerous services move to online and remote delivery. This included mental health and wellbeing interventions for care-experienced young people. To date there has been limited consideration of how different stakeholders experienced the receipt or delivery of remote provision during this period. We conducted online one-to-one and small group interviews with: young people with experience of care (n = 3); a young person whose biological parents were foster carers (n = 1); foster and kinship carers (n = 10); and social care and affiliated professionals (n = 9). We further engaged with relevant stakeholder consultation groups to refine and confirm study findings. Five central themes were generated, that reflected participants’ experience of a range of services, while also serving as recommendations for the future development and optimisation of provision: 1) Awareness: there is a lack of general awareness of mental health provision and understanding of what is available to support care-experienced young people, and a specific lack of knowledge regarding online support; 2) Choice and tailoring: young people need choice and flexibility in identifying provision that best suits their needs, and this includes the decision to receive online, blended or in-person services; 3) Training: carers and professionals need training on how to foster relationships with young people online and how to ensure safety and child protection; 4) Safety, protection and risk: young people need to have safe and private spaces when accessing online services; and 5) Access and resources: care-experienced young people don’t always have access to online support, and need appropriate technological devices that don’t have prohibitive restrictions. Taken together, the study findings offer insight into how interventions and services may be developed and optimised moving forward to ensure that they are meeting the needs of young people in care, and maximize likely effectiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Evans, Rhiannon & Cunningham, Emily & Stabler, Lorna & Vaughan, Rachael & Davies, Brittany & Cummings, Aimee & Boffey, Maria & Wooders, Charlotte & Mannay, Dawn, 2024. "Acceptability, feasibility and perceived effectiveness of online and remote mental health and wellbeing interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study with care-experienced young peop," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:156:y:2024:i:c:s0190740923005170
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107321
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740923005170
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107321?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:156:y:2024:i:c:s0190740923005170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.