IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v118y2020ics0190740920308902.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Motivation matters: Parents' path to adoption as related to their perceptions of open adoption

Author

Listed:
  • Sorek, Yoa
  • Ben Simon, Brachi
  • Nijim-Ektelat, Fida

Abstract

Structural openness in adoption has become very popular. However, it does not guarantee communicative openness. This study explores the relationship between adoptive parents' motivations for adopting children from the welfare system and their evolving reactions to their open adoption experiences. A qualitative descriptive study using semi-structured interviews with 16 Israeli adoptive parents revealed that those who adopted for child-centered reasons, most of whom have their own birth children, feel positive about open adoption and see its benefits for the child. Adoptive parents who adopted for self-oriented reasons, most of whom had been childless for many years, see it as a barrier to the development of the child's identity and sense of belonging, and tend to limit communicative openness. Recommendations for practice and research are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Sorek, Yoa & Ben Simon, Brachi & Nijim-Ektelat, Fida, 2020. "Motivation matters: Parents' path to adoption as related to their perceptions of open adoption," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:118:y:2020:i:c:s0190740920308902
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105430
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740920308902
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105430?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Neil, Elsbeth, 2012. "Making sense of adoption: Integration and differentiation from the perspective of adopted children in middle childhood," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 409-416.
    2. De Maeyer, Skrallan & Vanderfaeillie, Johan & Vanschoonlandt, Femke & Robberechts, Marijke & Van Holen, Frank, 2014. "Motivation for foster care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 143-149.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Welch, Vicki & Jones, Christine & Stalker, Kirsten & Stewart, Alasdair, 2015. "Permanence for disabled children and young people through foster care and adoption: A selective review of international literature," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 137-146.
    2. De Wilde, Lieselot & Devlieghere, Jochen & Vandenbroeck, Michel & Vanobbergen, Bruno, 2019. "Foster parents between voluntarism and professionalisation: Unpacking the backpack," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 290-296.
    3. Griffiths, Austin & Holderfield-Gaither, Emily & Funge, Simon P. & Warfel, Erin T., 2021. "Satisfaction, willingness, and well-being: Examining the perceptions of a statewide sample of public and private foster parents," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    4. Kontomichalos-Eyre, Soula A. & Lake, Amelia J. & McGillivray, Jane A., 2023. "Life story work for children and youth in out of home care: A systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    5. Baer, Lauren & Diehl, David K., 2019. "Foster care for teenagers: Motivators, barriers, and strategies to overcome barriers," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 264-277.
    6. Magalhães, Eunice & Costa, Patrício & Pinto, Vânia S. & Graça, João & Baptista, Joana & Ferreira, Sofia & Castro, Emma & Anjos, Catarina & Gouveia, Lucilina, 2022. "Reasons, willingness, and intention to be a foster family: A community-sample study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    7. Tregeagle, Susan & Moggach, Lynne & Trivedi, Helen & Ward, Harriet, 2019. "Previous life experiences and the vulnerability of children adopted from out-of-home care: The impact of Adverse Childhood Experiences and child welfare decision making," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 55-63.
    8. Watson, Debbie L. & Latter, Sandra & Bellew, Rebecca, 2015. "Adopted children and young people's views on their life storybooks: The role of narrative in the formation of identities," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 90-98.
    9. Susana Mariscal, E. & Akin, Becci A. & Lieberman, Alice A. & Washington, DaKie, 2015. "Exploring the path from foster care to stable and lasting adoption: Perceptions of foster care alumni," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 111-120.
    10. Elisete Diogo & Francisco Branco, 2019. "How Do People Become Foster Carers in Portugal? The Process of Building the Motivation," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-15, August.
    11. Davi, Nicole & Jones, Jennifer & Gillen, Martie, 2021. "An exploration of the motivations and barriers to being a foster parent in Florida," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    12. Soares, Joana & Barbosa-Ducharne, Maria & Palacios, Jesús & Fonseca, Sílvia, 2017. "Being adopted in the school context: Individual and interpersonal predictors," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 463-470.
    13. Foussiakda, Agino Cécilia & Kasherwa, Amani Clovis, 2020. "The challenges affecting foster care in a “failed-state” context: Case of the SEDI child protection network in South-Kivu Province, Democratic Republic of Congo," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    14. Anjos, Catarina & Magalhães, Eunice & Graça, João & Pinto, Vânia S. & Baptista, Joana & Pinheiro, Micaela, 2023. "Perceived barriers, drivers and enablers to becoming a foster family: An exploratory study in Portugal," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    15. Cooley, Morgan E. & Thompson, Heather M. & Colvin, Marianna L., 2019. "A qualitative examination of recruitment and motivation to become a Guardian ad Litem in the child welfare system," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 115-124.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:118:y:2020:i:c:s0190740920308902. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.