IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v215y2026ics0167947325001665.html

Resampling NANCOVA: Nonparametric analysis of covariance in small samples

Author

Listed:
  • Thiel, Konstantin Emil
  • Sattler, Paavo
  • Bathke, Arne C.
  • Zimmermann, Georg

Abstract

Analysis of covariance is a crucial method for improving precision of statistical tests for factor effects in randomized experiments. However, existing solutions suffer from one or more of the following limitations: (i) they are not suitable for ordinal data (as endpoints or explanatory variables); (ii) they require semiparametric model assumptions; (iii) they are inapplicable to small data scenarios due to often poor type-I error control; or (iv) they provide only approximate testing procedures and (asymptotically) exact test are missing. A resampling approach to the NANCOVA framework is investigated. NANCOVA is a fully nonparametric model based on relative effects that allows for an arbitrary number of covariates and groups, where both outcome variable (endpoint) and covariates can be metric or ordinal. Novel NANCOVA tests and a nonparametric competitor test without covariate adjustment were evaluated in extensive simulations. Unlike approximate tests in the NANCOVA framework, the proposed resampling version showed good performance in small sample scenarios and maintained the nominal type-I error well. Resampling NANCOVA also provided consistently high power: up to 26 % higher than the test without covariate adjustment in a small sample scenario with 4 groups and two covariates. Moreover, it is shown that resampling NANCOVA provides an asymptotically exact testing procedure, which makes it the first one with good finite sample performance in the present NANCOVA framework. In summary, resampling NANCOVA can be considered a viable tool for analysis of covariance overcoming issues (i) - (iv).

Suggested Citation

  • Thiel, Konstantin Emil & Sattler, Paavo & Bathke, Arne C. & Zimmermann, Georg, 2026. "Resampling NANCOVA: Nonparametric analysis of covariance in small samples," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:215:y:2026:i:c:s0167947325001665
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2025.108290
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947325001665
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2025.108290?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexander Schacht & Kris Bogaerts & Erich Bluhmki & Emmanuel Lesaffre, 2008. "A New Nonparametric Approach for Baseline Covariate Adjustment for Two-Group Comparative Studies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(4), pages 1110-1116, December.
    2. Olivier Thas & Jan De Neve & Lieven Clement & Jean-Pierre Ottoy, 2012. "Probabilistic index models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 74(4), pages 623-671, September.
    3. Friedrich, Sarah & Konietschke, Frank & Pauly, Markus, 2017. "A wild bootstrap approach for nonparametric repeated measurements," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 38-52.
    4. Dennis Dobler & Sarah Friedrich & Markus Pauly, 2020. "Nonparametric MANOVA in meaningful effects," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 72(4), pages 997-1022, August.
    5. Amorim, G. & Thas, O. & Vermeulen, K. & Vansteelandt, S. & De Neve, J., 2018. "Small sample inference for probabilistic index models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 137-148.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Debajit Chatterjee & Uttam Bandyopadhyay, 2019. "Testing in nonparametric ANCOVA model based on ridit reliability functional," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 71(2), pages 327-364, April.
    2. Edgar Brunner & Frank Konietschke & Arne C. Bathke & Markus Pauly, 2021. "Ranks and Pseudo‐ranks—Surprising Results of Certain Rank Tests in Unbalanced Designs," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 89(2), pages 349-366, August.
    3. Baumeister, Marléne & Ditzhaus, Marc & Pauly, Markus, 2024. "Quantile-based MANOVA: A new tool for inferring multivariate data in factorial designs," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    4. Dennis Dobler & Sarah Friedrich & Markus Pauly, 2020. "Nonparametric MANOVA in meaningful effects," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 72(4), pages 997-1022, August.
    5. Friedrich, Sarah & Pauly, Markus, 2018. "MATS: Inference for potentially singular and heteroscedastic MANOVA," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 166-179.
    6. Dennis Dobler & Markus Pauly, 2018. "Bootstrap- and permutation-based inference for the Mann–Whitney effect for right-censored and tied data," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 27(3), pages 639-658, September.
    7. Leyla Kodalci & Olivier Thas, 2023. "Simple and flexible sign and rank-based methods for testing for differential abundance in microbiome studies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(9), pages 1-17, September.
    8. Amorim, G. & Thas, O. & Vermeulen, K. & Vansteelandt, S. & De Neve, J., 2018. "Small sample inference for probabilistic index models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 137-148.
    9. Jentsch, Carsten & Leucht, Anne, 2014. "Bootstrapping Sample Quantiles of Discrete Data," Working Papers 14-15, University of Mannheim, Department of Economics.
    10. Fan, Chunpeng & Zhang, Donghui, 2014. "Wald-type rank tests: A GEE approach," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1-16.
    11. Bang Wang & Zi Wang & Yu Cheng, 2026. "Generalized win-odds regression models for composite endpoints," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 1-24, March.
    12. Yuan, Ao & Zheng, Yanxun & Huang, Peng & Tan, Ming T., 2016. "A nonparametric test for the evaluation of group sequential clinical trials with covariate information," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 82-99.
    13. Lu Mao & Tuo Wang, 2021. "A class of proportional win‐fractions regression models for composite outcomes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 77(4), pages 1265-1275, December.
    14. Zimmermann, Georg & Pauly, Markus & Bathke, Arne C., 2020. "Multivariate analysis of covariance with potentially singular covariance matrices and non-normal responses," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    15. Umlauft, Maria & Placzek, Marius & Konietschke, Frank & Pauly, Markus, 2019. "Wild bootstrapping rank-based procedures: Multiple testing in nonparametric factorial repeated measures designs," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 176-192.
    16. Han, Kyunghee & Park, Yeonjoo & Kim, Soo-Young, 2025. "Statistical inference for partially shape-constrained function-on-scalar linear regression models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    17. Julio López‐Laborda & Jaime Vallés‐Giménez & Anabel Zarate‐Marco, 2023. "Fighting vacation rental tax evasion through warnings to potential evaders," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 51(6), pages 1437-1466, November.
    18. Alan Agresti & Claudia Tarantola, 2018. "Simple ways to interpret effects in modeling ordinal categorical data," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 72(3), pages 210-223, August.
    19. Ejike R. Ugba & Daniel Mörlein & Jan Gertheiss, 2021. "Smoothing in Ordinal Regression: An Application to Sensory Data," Stats, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-18, July.
    20. Alan Agresti & Maria Kateri, 2017. "Ordinal probability effect measures for group comparisons in multinomial cumulative link models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(1), pages 214-219, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:215:y:2026:i:c:s0167947325001665. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.