IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chieco/v93y2025ics1043951x2500149x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reducing fertilizer overuse via mechanized fertilization in China: Is outsourcing more effective?

Author

Listed:
  • Cai, Rong
  • Zhao, Hairan
  • Ma, Jie

Abstract

This study examines the impact of different mechanized fertilization models- specifically, outsourcing fertilization services versus purchasing fertilization machinery- on fertilizer use intensity, using survey data from rice scale farms in East China. To address potential selection bias, we employ a treatment effect model to examine the average (homogeneous) impact of outsourcing and use an unconditional quantile regression model combined with a two-stage predictor substitution approach to explore the impact at different levels of fertilizer use intensity. Additionally, we construct a stochastic meta-frontier input distance function to evaluate fertilizer use efficiency and the fertilization technology gap ratio among farmers using different mechanized fertilization models. To further elucidate the mechanisms through which outsourcing influences fertilizer use intensity, we apply a fractional regression model. Empirical results reveal that outsourcing fertilization services significantly reduces fertilizer use intensity compared to the use of self-owned fertilization machinery, with an average decrease of 7.93 % per mu and 7.88 % per 100 kg of rice yield. Notably, the reduction is more pronounced among farmers with initially higher levels of fertilizer use intensity. While farmers using outsourcing achieve similar fertilizer use efficiency relative to their frontiers as those using self-owned fertilization machinery, they differ significantly in the fertilization technology gap ratio. Outsourcing significantly improves the technology gap ratio, suggesting that its advantage in reducing fertilizer use intensity primarily due to improved fertilization techniques.

Suggested Citation

  • Cai, Rong & Zhao, Hairan & Ma, Jie, 2025. "Reducing fertilizer overuse via mechanized fertilization in China: Is outsourcing more effective?," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:chieco:v:93:y:2025:i:c:s1043951x2500149x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chieco.2025.102491
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043951X2500149X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chieco.2025.102491?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D24 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Production; Cost; Capital; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity; Capacity
    • Q12 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets
    • Q15 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Land Ownership and Tenure; Land Reform; Land Use; Irrigation; Agriculture and Environment

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chieco:v:93:y:2025:i:c:s1043951x2500149x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/chieco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.