IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/bushor/v62y2019i5p589-594.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Workplace incivility against women in STEM: Insights and best practices

Author

Listed:
  • Saxena, Mahima
  • Geiselman, Timothy Adam
  • Zhang, Sheng

Abstract

As demonstrated by both empirical and non-empirical research, women are more likely than men to be a target of workplace incivility. This manifests in a variety of negative outcomes for female employees, including turnover intentions, poor performance, and higher levels of stress. The problem is exacerbated for women in STEM fields due to factors unique to these industries. Herein, we outline the unique characteristics of STEM organizations that can foster the creation and sustenance of an atmosphere promoting workplace incivility against female employees. Then, we provide five best practice recommendations geared toward reducing incivility, improving work climate, and promoting overall retention of women in STEM.

Suggested Citation

  • Saxena, Mahima & Geiselman, Timothy Adam & Zhang, Sheng, 2019. "Workplace incivility against women in STEM: Insights and best practices," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 62(5), pages 589-594.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:62:y:2019:i:5:p:589-594
    DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2019.05.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007681319300758
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.bushor.2019.05.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:thr:techub:10030:y:2022:i:1:p:214-237 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Burke-Smalley, Lisa A. & Evans, W. Randy & Zelin, Alexandra I., 2022. "Voices of abused workers: Implications for mitigating worker mistreatment," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 315-327.
    3. Irene Chaidi & Chara Papoutsi & Athanasios Drigas & Charalabos Skianis, 2022. "Women: E-Entrepreneurship and Emotional Intelligence," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 30(1), pages 214-237, April.
    4. Ann Mari May & Mary G. McGarvey & Muazzam Toshmatova, 2024. "Gender differences in graduate student views on the professional climate in economics," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 42(2), pages 206-222, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:62:y:2019:i:5:p:589-594. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/bushor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.