IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/bushor/v54yi1p33-40.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diversity goals: Reframing the debate and enabling a fair evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Hamdani, Maria Riaz
  • Buckley, M. Ronald

Abstract

While diversity has enjoyed significant popularity in the corporate world for the last two decades, researchers continue to put forward conflicting results regarding the business benefits of workplace diversity. Some say workplace diversity is good for businesses; others argue it is an undertaking full of challenges; and yet others assert that it doesn't really matter. With this in mind, we attempted to synthesize the research that evaluates the impact of workplace diversity on the organizational bottom line. We find an over-emphasis on demonstrating the business case of diversity in economic denominations, which--to some extent--has limited our understanding of the complex dynamics associated with diversity. We identify a lack of attention toward institutional forces as one of the reasons that has restricted our focus on mere economic gains. Overall, we recommend broadening our definition of goals that organizations have when adopting diversity initiatives by including 'gain of legitimacy' and 'creation of goodwill' as part of the essential consequences of diversity programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Hamdani, Maria Riaz & Buckley, M. Ronald, 2011. "Diversity goals: Reframing the debate and enabling a fair evaluation," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 33-40, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:54:y::i:1:p:33-40
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007-6813(10)00118-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fitzsimmons, Stacey R., 2012. "Women on boards of directors: Why skirts in seats aren’t enough," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 55(6), pages 557-566.
    2. Riccò, Rossella & Guerci, Marco, 2014. "Diversity challenge: An integrated process to bridge the ‘implementation gap’," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 235-245.
    3. Brooklyn Cole & Manjula Salimath, 2013. "Diversity Identity Management: An Organizational Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 116(1), pages 151-161, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:54:y::i:1:p:33-40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/bushor .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.