IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/asieco/v100y2025ics1049007825001186.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rent-seeking cooperatives under information asymmetry: Evidence from agricultural subsidy policy in China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhi, Xiaoxu
  • Liu, Zongzhi
  • Yuan, Lingran
  • Shi, Xinjie
  • Huang, Biao
  • Gong, Binlei

Abstract

We tell a distinct story of subsidy-induced market inefficiency using the case of rent-seeking shell cooperatives in China. We dynamically identify them from 13 million observations, and examine their crowding-out effects in the market decision and performance dimensions. We find that a doubling of subsidy leads to 0.3 more shell entrants and 0.2 more shell converts per village. This brings a 2.6% increase in the proportion of shell cooperatives, a corresponding 2.7% decline in the economic performance of non-shell cooperatives, and a 3.6% reduction in the subsidy effect. The prevalence of shell cooperatives can be attributed to the strategic behavior of cooperatives and farmers caused by information asymmetry (weak government regulation) and subsidy-seeking motivation. Among them, the advantaged farmers are the promoters and ultimate beneficiaries.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhi, Xiaoxu & Liu, Zongzhi & Yuan, Lingran & Shi, Xinjie & Huang, Biao & Gong, Binlei, 2025. "Rent-seeking cooperatives under information asymmetry: Evidence from agricultural subsidy policy in China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:asieco:v:100:y:2025:i:c:s1049007825001186
    DOI: 10.1016/j.asieco.2025.101994
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049007825001186
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.asieco.2025.101994?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Q13 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Markets and Marketing; Cooperatives; Agribusiness
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy
    • H20 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:asieco:v:100:y:2025:i:c:s1049007825001186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/asieco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.