IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/aosoci/v15y1990i3p171-178.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Budgetary participation, agreement on evaluation criteria and managerial performance: A research note

Author

Listed:
  • Dunk, Alan S.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Dunk, Alan S., 1990. "Budgetary participation, agreement on evaluation criteria and managerial performance: A research note," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 171-178.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:aosoci:v:15:y:1990:i:3:p:171-178
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0361-3682(90)90002-C
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bonache, Adrien & Maurice, Jonathan & Georgescu, Irène, 2009. "Enseignement d'une meta-analyse sur le lien participation budgétaire-performance managériale [Lesson from Meta-analysis for the relation between budgetary participation and managerial performance]," MPRA Paper 12958, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Asogwa & Ikenna Elias & Etim & Osim Etim, 2017. "Traditional Budgeting in Today’s Business Environment," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 7(3), pages 1-7.
    3. Nava Subramaniam & Neal M. Ashkanasy, 2001. "The Effect of Organisational Culture Perceptions on the Relationship Between Budgetary Participation and Managerial Job-Related Outcomes," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 26(1), pages 35-54, June.
    4. Agbejule, Adebayo & Saarikoski, Lotta, 2006. "The effect of cost management knowledge on the relationship between budgetary participation and managerial performance," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 427-440.
    5. Magner, Nace & Welker, Robert B. & Campbell, Terry L., 1995. "The interactive effect of budgetary participation and budget favorability on attitudes toward budgetary decision makers: A research note," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 20(7-8), pages 611-618.
    6. Bonache, Adrien & Maurice, Jonathan & Georgescu, Irène, 2009. "Enseignement d'une meta-analyse sur le lien participation budgétaire-performance managériale [Lesson from Meta-analysis for the relation between budgetary participation and managerial performance]," MPRA Paper 12958, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Shannon W. Anderson & Henri C. Dekker & Karen L. Sedatole, 2010. "An Empirical Examination of Goals and Performance-to-Goal Following the Introduction of an Incentive Bonus Plan with Participative Goal Setting," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(1), pages 90-109, January.
    8. Staci A. Kenno & Michelle C. Lau & Barbara J. Sainty, 2018. "In Search of a Theory of Budgeting: A Literature Review," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(4), pages 507-553, December.
    9. Christian Daumoser & Bernhard Hirsch & Matthias Sohn, 2018. "Honesty in budgeting: a review of morality and control aspects in the budgetary slack literature," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 115-159, August.
    10. Van der Stede, Wim A. & Young, S. Mark & Chen, Clara Xiaoling, 2005. "Assessing the quality of evidence in empirical management accounting research: The case of survey studies," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 30(7-8), pages 655-684.
    11. Luft, Joan & Shields, Michael D., 2003. "Mapping management accounting: graphics and guidelines for theory-consistent empirical research," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(2-3), pages 169-249.
    12. Shields, J. F. & Shields, M. D., 1998. "Antecedents of participative budgeting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 49-76, January.
    13. Jan Noeverman & Bas A.S. Koene & Roger Williams, 2005. "Construct measurement of evaluative style: a review and proposal," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 2(1), pages 77-107, April.
    14. Merchant, Kenneth A. & Van der Stede, Wim A. & Zheng, Liu, 2003. "Disciplinary constraints on the advancement of knowledge: the case of organizational incentive systems," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(2-3), pages 251-286.
    15. Hartmann, Frank G. H. & Moers, Frank, 1999. "Testing contingency hypotheses in budgetary research: an evaluation of the use of moderated regression analysis," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 291-315, May.
    16. Armelle Godener & Marianela Fornerino & Jocelyne Deglaine, 2002. "Implication des acteurs dans le processus de contrôle de gestion : influence des pratiques de communication orale des contrôleurs de gestion sur les attitudes et comportements des managers," Post-Print hal-00455184, HAL.
    17. Derfuss, Klaus, 2016. "Reconsidering the participative budgeting–performance relation: A meta-analysis regarding the impact of level of analysis, sample selection, measurement, and industry influences," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 17-37.
    18. Armelle Godener & Marianela Fornerino & Jocelyne Deglaine, 2002. "Implication des acteurs dans le processus de contrôle de gestion : influence des pratiques de communication orale des contrôleurs de gestion sur les attitudes et comportements des managers," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-00455184, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:aosoci:v:15:y:1990:i:3:p:171-178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/aos .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.