IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v245y2021ics0378377420322101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How does film mulching modify available energy, evapotranspiration, and crop coefficient during the seed–maize growing season in northwest China?

Author

Listed:
  • Zhao, Yin
  • Mao, Xiaomin
  • Shukla, Manoj K.
  • Tian, Fei
  • Hou, Mengjie
  • Zhang, Tong
  • Li, Sien

Abstract

Plastic film mulching has been widely applied in farmland around the world, which could complicate the mass and energy exchange between soil surface and atmosphere. Although previous studies suggested that film mulching reduced available energy (Rn − G) and crop evapotranspiration (ET) in some crop growth stages, it was unclear how film mulching would influence energy partition, crop ET and crop coefficient (Kc) during the entire growing season. A two-year field experiment in a mulched (FM) and a non-mulched (NM) seed–maize field under drip irrigation was conducted in Shiyang River Basin of northwest China to quantify the effects of FM on energy balance components, ET and Kc, by measuring the net radiation (Rn), the soil heat flux (G), the evaporation (E) on ground surface, the transpiration (T), and the soil water content along the soil profile. In particular, ET was obtained by a water balance method and a three-temperature (3T) model combined with remote sensing. Results showed that FM significantly decreased daily Rn and daily G before jointing stage (i.e., the initial stage), which caused 19.0% reduction of the daily Rn − G. The effects of FM on Rn, G and Rn − G diminished after jointing stage (i.e., the crop development, middle and late stages). The reduction of Rn − G under FM treatment during the initial stage was accompanied with the decrease of ET during the initial stage, consequently 6.2% less total ET in the entire seed–maize growing season was recorded compared with NM treatment. FM had a significant effect on the partition of ET components, and E and T were 0.52 and 1.10 times of those under NM treatment, respectively. FM significantly reduced Kc during the initial stage (Kc-ini) by 55.3%, while in the middle (Kc-mid) and late (Kc-end) stages, it decreased by 5.7% and 9.7%, respectively, compared with NM treatment. The Kc varied with the leaf area index (LAI) following the parabolic relationship for both treatments. A structural equation model (SEM) showed that among the soil and crop factors, FM and soil temperature (ST) were the main factors affecting Rn − G, ET and Kc during the initial stage; while during the crop development, middle and late stages, ST and LAI were the main factors affecting Rn − G and ET, and Kc was mainly affected by LAI. SEM further confirmed that the FM impact was more significant during the initial stage than during the crop development, middle and late stages.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhao, Yin & Mao, Xiaomin & Shukla, Manoj K. & Tian, Fei & Hou, Mengjie & Zhang, Tong & Li, Sien, 2021. "How does film mulching modify available energy, evapotranspiration, and crop coefficient during the seed–maize growing season in northwest China?," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:245:y:2021:i:c:s0378377420322101
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106666
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377420322101
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106666?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jackson, R. D. & Hatfield, J. L. & Reginato, R. J. & Idso, S. B. & Pinter, P. J., 1983. "Estimation of daily evapotranspiration from one time-of-day measurements," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 7(1-3), pages 351-362, September.
    2. Feng, Yu & Gong, Daozhi & Mei, Xurong & Hao, Weiping & Tang, Dahua & Cui, Ningbo, 2017. "Energy balance and partitioning in partial plastic mulched and non-mulched maize fields on the Loess Plateau of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 193-206.
    3. He, Qinsi & Li, Sien & Kang, Shaozhong & Yang, Hanbo & Qin, Shujing, 2018. "Simulation of water balance in a maize field under film-mulching drip irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 252-260.
    4. Zhao, Peng & Li, Sien & Li, Fusheng & Du, Taisheng & Tong, Ling & Kang, Shaozhong, 2015. "Comparison of dual crop coefficient method and Shuttleworth–Wallace model in evapotranspiration partitioning in a vineyard of northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 41-56.
    5. Ding, Risheng & Kang, Shaozhong & Zhang, Yanqun & Hao, Xinmei & Tong, Ling & Du, Taisheng, 2013. "Partitioning evapotranspiration into soil evaporation and transpiration using a modified dual crop coefficient model in irrigated maize field with ground-mulching," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 85-96.
    6. Li, Sien & Kang, Shaozhong & Li, Fusheng & Zhang, Lu, 2008. "Evapotranspiration and crop coefficient of spring maize with plastic mulch using eddy covariance in northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(11), pages 1214-1222, November.
    7. Zhang, Yanqun & Wang, Jiandong & Gong, Shihong & Xu, Di & Sui, Juan & Wu, Zhongdong & Mo, Yan, 2018. "Effects of film mulching on evapotranspiration, yield and water use efficiency of a maize field with drip irrigation in Northeastern China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 90-99.
    8. Wang, Xingwang & Huo, Zailin & Shukla, Manoj K. & Wang, Xianghao & Guo, Ping & Xu, Xu & Huang, Guanhua, 2020. "Energy fluxes and evapotranspiration over irrigated maize field in an arid area with shallow groundwater," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    9. Jiao, Linjie & Ding, Risheng & Kang, Shaozhong & Du, Taisheng & Tong, Ling & Li, Sien, 2018. "A comparison of energy partitioning and evapotranspiration over closed maize and sparse grapevine canopies in northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 251-260.
    10. Gong, Daozhi & Mei, Xurong & Hao, Weiping & Wang, Hanbo & Caylor, Kelly K., 2017. "Comparison of ET partitioning and crop coefficients between partial plastic mulched and non-mulched maize fields," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 23-34.
    11. Tian, Fuqiang & Yang, Pengju & Hu, Hongchang & Liu, Hui, 2017. "Energy balance and canopy conductance for a cotton field under film mulched drip irrigation in an arid region of northwestern China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 110-121.
    12. Hou, Mengjie & Tian, Fei & Zhang, Tong & Huang, Mengsi, 2019. "Evaluation of canopy temperature depression, transpiration, and canopy greenness in relation to yield of soybean at reproductive stage based on remote sensing imagery," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 182-192.
    13. Balwinder-Singh & Eberbach, P.L. & Humphreys, E. & Kukal, S.S., 2011. "The effect of rice straw mulch on evapotranspiration, transpiration and soil evaporation of irrigated wheat in Punjab, India," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(12), pages 1847-1855, October.
    14. Kang, Shaozhong & Gu, Binjie & Du, Taisheng & Zhang, Jianhua, 2003. "Crop coefficient and ratio of transpiration to evapotranspiration of winter wheat and maize in a semi-humid region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(3), pages 239-254, April.
    15. Jiang, Xuelian & Kang, Shaozhong & Tong, Ling & Li, Fusheng & Li, Donghao & Ding, Risheng & Qiu, Rangjian, 2014. "Crop coefficient and evapotranspiration of grain maize modified by planting density in an arid region of northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 135-143.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liyuan Bo & Xiaomin Mao & Yali Wang, 2022. "Assessing the Applicability of Biodegradable Film Mulching in Northwest China Based on Comprehensive Benefits Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-23, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Feng, Yu & Hao, Weiping & Gao, Lili & Li, Haoru & Gong, Daozhi & Cui, Ningbo, 2019. "Comparison of maize water consumption at different scales between mulched and non-mulched croplands," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 315-324.
    2. Feng, Yu & Gong, Daozhi & Mei, Xurong & Hao, Weiping & Tang, Dahua & Cui, Ningbo, 2017. "Energy balance and partitioning in partial plastic mulched and non-mulched maize fields on the Loess Plateau of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 193-206.
    3. Qin, Shujing & Li, Sien & Kang, Shaozhong & Du, Taisheng & Tong, Ling & Ding, Risheng & Wang, Yahui & Guo, Hui, 2019. "Transpiration of female and male parents of seed maize in northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 397-409.
    4. Jovanovic, N. & Pereira, L.S. & Paredes, P. & Pôças, I. & Cantore, V. & Todorovic, M., 2020. "A review of strategies, methods and technologies to reduce non-beneficial consumptive water use on farms considering the FAO56 methods," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    5. Zheng, Jing & Fan, Junliang & Zhang, Fucang & Zhuang, Qianlai, 2021. "Evapotranspiration partitioning and water productivity of rainfed maize under contrasting mulching conditions in Northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    6. Qiu, Rangjian & Liu, Chunwei & Cui, Ningbo & Wu, Youjie & Wang, Zhenchang & Li, Gen, 2019. "Evapotranspiration estimation using a modified Priestley-Taylor model in a rice-wheat rotation system," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 1-1.
    7. Pereira, L.S. & Paredes, P. & Hunsaker, D.J. & López-Urrea, R. & Mohammadi Shad, Z., 2021. "Standard single and basal crop coefficients for field crops. Updates and advances to the FAO56 crop water requirements method," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    8. Zhao, Peng & Kang, Shaozhong & Li, Sien & Ding, Risheng & Tong, Ling & Du, Taisheng, 2018. "Seasonal variations in vineyard ET partitioning and dual crop coefficients correlate with canopy development and surface soil moisture," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 19-33.
    9. Liyuan Bo & Xiaomin Mao & Yali Wang, 2022. "Assessing the Applicability of Biodegradable Film Mulching in Northwest China Based on Comprehensive Benefits Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-23, August.
    10. Qin, Shujing & Fan, Yangzhen & Li, Sien & Cheng, Lei & Zhang, Lu & Xi, Haiyang & Qiu, Rangjian & Liu, Pan, 2023. "Partitioning of available energy in canopy and soil surface in croplands with different irrigation methods," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    11. Jiang, Xuelian & Kang, Shaozhong & Li, Fusheng & Du, Taisheng & Tong, Ling & Comas, Louise, 2016. "Evapotranspiration partitioning and variation of sap flow in female and male parents of maize for hybrid seed production in arid region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 132-141.
    12. Gong, Xuewen & Qiu, Rangjian & Zhang, Baozhong & Wang, Shunsheng & Ge, Jiankun & Gao, Shikai & Yang, Zaiqiang, 2021. "Energy budget for tomato plants grown in a greenhouse in northern China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    13. Kang, Jian & Hao, Xinmei & Zhou, Huiping & Ding, Risheng, 2021. "An integrated strategy for improving water use efficiency by understanding physiological mechanisms of crops responding to water deficit: Present and prospect," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    14. Wang, Yueyue & Horton, Robert & Xue, Xuzhang & Ren, Tusheng, 2021. "Partitioning evapotranspiration by measuring soil water evaporation with heat-pulse sensors and plant transpiration with sap flow gauges," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    15. Gong, Xuewen & Qiu, Rangjian & Ge, Jiankun & Bo, Guokui & Ping, Yinglu & Xin, Qingsong & Wang, Shunsheng, 2021. "Evapotranspiration partitioning of greenhouse grown tomato using a modified Priestley–Taylor model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    16. Jiang, Xuelian & Kang, Shaozhong & Tong, Ling & Li, Sien & Ding, Risheng & Du, Taisheng, 2019. "Modeling evapotranspiration and its components of maize for seed production in an arid region of northwest China using a dual crop coefficient and multisource models," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 105-117.
    17. Wang, Xingwang & Huo, Zailin & Shukla, Manoj K. & Wang, Xianghao & Guo, Ping & Xu, Xu & Huang, Guanhua, 2020. "Energy fluxes and evapotranspiration over irrigated maize field in an arid area with shallow groundwater," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    18. Qin, Shujing & Li, Sien & Cheng, Lei & Zhang, Lu & Qiu, Rangjian & Liu, Pan & Xi, Haiyang, 2023. "Partitioning evapotranspiration in partially mulched interplanted croplands by improving the Shuttleworth-Wallace model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    19. Mingze Yao & Manman Gao & Jingkuan Wang & Bo Li & Lizhen Mao & Mingyu Zhao & Zhanyang Xu & Hongfei Niu & Tieliang Wang & Lei Sun & Dongshuang Niu, 2023. "Estimating Evapotranspiration of Greenhouse Tomato under Different Irrigation Levels Using a Modified Dual Crop Coefficient Model in Northeast China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-19, September.
    20. Jingtao Qin & Xiaosen Wang & Xichao Fan & Mingliang Jiang & Mouchao Lv, 2022. "Whether Increasing Maize Planting Density Increases the Total Water Use Depends on Soil Water in the 0–60 cm Soil Layer in the North China Plain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-13, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:245:y:2021:i:c:s0378377420322101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.