IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agisys/v145y2016icp106-115.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental benefits of canola production in 2010 compared to 1990: A life cycle perspective

Author

Listed:
  • MacWilliam, Susan
  • Sanscartier, David
  • Lemke, Reynald
  • Wismer, Monique
  • Baron, Vern

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the changes in environmental performance over time of canola production due to changes to management and production practices on the Canadian prairies. Selected environmental impacts of canola production in 2010 and in 1990 in the Gray, Black, and Dark Brown/Brown soil zones of Western Canada were quantified (1990 analysis was limited to Alberta due to data availability). The life cycle assessment (up to the farm gate) was carried out on a per-tonne-of-canola basis. There were limited differences in impacts across soil zones for the 2010 production system. Differences across soil zones were generally more pronounced for the 1990 production system. The production and use of fertilizers (both production and field emissions) and the use of farm equipment (for tillage, harvest, etc.) were the major contributors, accounting for up to 95% of the environmental impacts of canola production in both time periods. Overall, the environmental impacts of producing one tonne of canola were reduced between the 1990 and 2010 time periods. Over the past two decades, the on-farm fuel use and fertilizer applied per tonne of canola decreased, which led to reduced greenhouse gas emissions and improved ecosystem quality (acidification being the exception). The improvements in the environmental profile of canola production between 1990 and 2010 were due to a combination of factors, particularly the advances in crop management practices including tillage and large-scale adoption of herbicide tolerant hybrid canola, that have led to increases in average yields and in efficiency of inputs use.

Suggested Citation

  • MacWilliam, Susan & Sanscartier, David & Lemke, Reynald & Wismer, Monique & Baron, Vern, 2016. "Environmental benefits of canola production in 2010 compared to 1990: A life cycle perspective," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 106-115.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:145:y:2016:i:c:p:106-115
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.03.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X16300464
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agsy.2016.03.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Devin Moeller & Heidi L. Sieverding & James J. Stone, 2017. "Comparative Farm-Gate Life Cycle Assessment of Oilseed Feedstocks in the Northern Great Plains," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 2(4), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Rabiee, Mohammad & Majidian, Majid & Alizadeh, Mohammad Reza & Kavoosi, Masoud, 2021. "Evaluation of energy use efficiency and greenhouse gas emission in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) production in paddy fields of Guilan province of Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    3. Dainius Steponavičius & Aurelija Kemzūraitė & Laimis Bauša & Ernestas Zaleckas, 2019. "Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Pod Sealants in Increasing Pod Shattering Resistance in Oilseed Rape ( Brassica napus L.)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-19, June.
    4. Chelsea Sutherland & Savannah Gleim & Stuart J. Smyth, 2021. "Correlating Genetically Modified Crops, Glyphosate Use and Increased Carbon Sequestration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-15, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:145:y:2016:i:c:p:106-115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agsy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.