IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agisys/v121y2013icp130-134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Typology and physical–chemical characterization of bovine milk produced with different productions strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Gabbi, A.M.
  • McManus, C.M.
  • Silva, A.V.
  • Marques, L.T.
  • Zanela, M.B.
  • Stumpf, M.P.
  • Fischer, V.

Abstract

In the tropics, milk production systems present high diversity and distinct ability to adapt to the demands of consumers and market conditions. Knowledge of the factors that affect the quality of milk and agglomerate of production systems into fewer groups can facilitate analysis and the decisions needed to improve them. The objective of this paper was to characterize, classify and analyze dairy production systems in the Brazilian southern region, and relate their productive aspects to the physical–chemical attributes of the milk produced. A multivariate analysis was conducted with 26 indicators obtained from a survey covering 328 dairy farms. Variance was fully explained by the first three principal factors. The first factor included feeding strategies, the second included the farm’s structure traits and the third included milk composition. Canonical analysis revealed distribution of farmers into three clusters. All feeding strategies, except salt supplementation, as well as monthly milk production, herd size, number of lactating cows in farm and unstable milk frequency were important discriminant variables to determinate cluster formation. The clusters were differentiated by feeding strategies used and the high standard deviation in some of these strategies demonstrated the adoption of specific strategies in different seasons. Cluster 3 had the largest monthly milk production and larger number of lactating cows, but the productivity of cows in the different clusters was not significantly different. The lower unstable milk frequency in cluster 3 is associated with more intensive use of silage, mineral-vitamin premix and commercial concentrate in the diet of animals. The physical–chemical composition of milk and the somatic cell count did not differ between clusters.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabbi, A.M. & McManus, C.M. & Silva, A.V. & Marques, L.T. & Zanela, M.B. & Stumpf, M.P. & Fischer, V., 2013. "Typology and physical–chemical characterization of bovine milk produced with different productions strategies," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 130-134.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:121:y:2013:i:c:p:130-134
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2013.07.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X13000905
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agsy.2013.07.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sintayehu Yigrem & André Markemann & Girma Abebe & Joseph Ogutu & Hans-Peter Piepho & Anne Zárate, 2015. "Assessing the relative importance of dairy products to family nutrition in mixed crop-livestock production systems of Ethiopia," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 7(5), pages 1003-1015, October.
    2. Toro-Mujica, Paula & Vera, Raúl & Pinedo, Pablo & Bas, Fernando & Enríquez-Hidalgo, Daniel & Vargas-Bello-Pérez, Einar, 2020. "Adaptation strategies based on the historical evolution for dairy production systems in temperate areas: A case study approach," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:121:y:2013:i:c:p:130-134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agsy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.