IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/edt/jsserr/v9y2022i2p175-183.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Neutrosophic Socio-Discoursiveness: From Ceremonial To Incertitude

Author

Listed:
  • Georgiana Camelia Stanescu

    (University of Craiova)

Abstract

This study represents an implementation of neutrosophy in the field of verbal communication (discourse). The methods used include meta-analytical, comparative, and inductive techniques. In relation to the neutrosophic criterion (F. Smarandache), as well as to the way of thinking (Vattimo G & Rovatti P-A, 1998), we can distinguish two types of discourse: the ceremonial and the impositive discourse. In Gianni Vattimo's opinion (1998), there are two types of thinking: weak and strong thinking (weak and strong thought). The ceremonial discourse is based on weak thinking, and it has a high neutrosophic coefficient. The impositive discourse lies on strong thought and contains a low neutrosophic coefficient; this type of discourse embodies two forms: argumentation (the reasoning) and the demonstration. Starting from different directions, both types of discourse come close to the validation of knowledge, more precisely to what is true and what is false. This study puts forward the fact that the evidence, the demonstration, and the argumentation stand for discoursive aids that can consolidate a space of the critical opinion and of the neutrosophic incertitude or a space of silence, according to the degree of eligibility and imposition.

Suggested Citation

  • Georgiana Camelia Stanescu, 2022. "Neutrosophic Socio-Discoursiveness: From Ceremonial To Incertitude," Social Sciences and Education Research Review, Department of Communication, Journalism and Education Sciences, University of Craiova, vol. 9(2), pages 175-183, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:edt:jsserr:v:9:y:2022:i:2:p:175-183
    DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10053409
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://sserr.ro/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/sserr-9-2-175-183.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5281/zenodo.10053409?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Florentin Smarandache & Daniela Gifu & Mirela Teodorescu, 2015. "Neutrosophic elements in discourse," Social Sciences and Education Research Review, Department of Communication, Journalism and Education Sciences, University of Craiova, vol. 2(1), pages 25-32, August.
    2. Florentin Smarandache, 2015. "Neutrosophic social structures specificities," Social Sciences and Education Research Review, Department of Communication, Journalism and Education Sciences, University of Craiova, vol. 2(1), pages 3-10, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vlad I. RO?CA, 2017. "Using Internal Marketing Communications to Improve HRM in Service-Based Sports Organizations," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 18(4), pages 406-420, October.
    2. Janusz Grabara & Mircea Bunaciu, 2015. "The Existence of Disagreements in Organisational Entities - Source of the Occurrence of Conflicts at Work," Annals of the University of Craiova for Journalism, Communication and Management, Department of Communication, Journalism and Education Sciences, University of Craiova, vol. 1(1), pages 4-23, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    neutrosophy; discourse; ceremonial discourse; impositive discourse; argumentation; demonstration;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:edt:jsserr:v:9:y:2022:i:2:p:175-183. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dan Valeriu Voinea (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cis01.central.ucv.ro/litere/cadr_juridic/departament_comunicare_jurnalism_stiinte_ale_educatiei/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.