Author
Listed:
- Khondokar Sabera HAMID
(South Point School and College, Dhaka, Bangladesh)
- Mohammad ALI ZINNAH
(Institute of Education and Research (IER), University of Dhaka, Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh)
Abstract
This qualitative study considers primary school teachers' perceptions and implementations of formative assessment in their Social Science classrooms in Dhaka. Through in-depth interviews, observations in selected schools, and literature reviews, the study documents the conceptualization of the assessment by the teachers, what they currently do, and the barriers they face. The results can point to a stark contrast between teachers' perception and actual practice. Most teachers feel that formative assessment is the best kind of assessment to facilitate learning, but the limited array of their concrete practices in the classroom usually covers only such things as verbal questioning and written exercises for students to undertake. The study also finds that they supply a number of reasons preventing them from practicing these methods to the fullest extent: large numbers of students in classes, heavy time constraints, and lack of training in this regard. In additional to these are a strong systemic orientation towards high-stakes summative examination and a dearth of resources for making the best use of this assessment. The study closes with some recommendations on how to bridge this gap. For assessment to become more meaningful and dynamic, formative assessment must be embedded into lesson planning. The study also recommended enhancing teacher training, encouraging collaborative approaches to teaching, and ensuring that schools provide adequate administrative support. By addressing these issues, we assist teachers in harnessing the potential of formative assessment for deeper learning.
Suggested Citation
Khondokar Sabera HAMID & Mohammad ALI ZINNAH, 2025.
"Perceptions And Practices Of Formative Assessment In Primary Social Science Classrooms In Dhaka City,"
Social Sciences and Education Research Review, Department of Communication, Journalism and Education Sciences, University of Craiova, vol. 12(2), pages 154-162, December.
Handle:
RePEc:edt:jsserr:v:12:y:2025:i:2:p:154-162
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17870682
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:edt:jsserr:v:12:y:2025:i:2:p:154-162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dan Valeriu Voinea (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cis01.central.ucv.ro/litere/cadr_juridic/departament_comunicare_jurnalism_stiinte_ale_educatiei/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.