IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ebl/ecbull/eb-09-00371.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the SEC Review of Commercial Banks: Evidence from Comment Letters

Author

Listed:
  • Victor Valdivia

    () (City University of New York)

Abstract

This paper examines whether the oversight provided by the SEC over commercial banks was appropriate in the period immediately preceding the end of the recent real-estate boom. The approach followed here is to first identify the variables that are of interest to those who invest in banks, and then to present evidence from comment letters to identify the areas in which the SEC actually focuses on . These two results are then compared to determine if the SEC's review efforts are aligned with the interests of bank investors. The results are mixed: in some instances the SEC focuses on the same areas as investors, but in other cases it does not – either because the SEC does not focus on areas of interest to investors, or because the SEC focuses in areas that are of questionable or no interest to investors. Even in cases in which the SEC and investors' interests are aligned, however, investors would benefit from enhanced disclosures. Overall, the paper suggests specific improvements to the SEC review process by identifying areas in which the SEC should focus on, and by suggesting areas of improved disclosure. Finally, this paper also examines the attributes of banks that generated issues upon SEC review.

Suggested Citation

  • Victor Valdivia, 2010. "Evaluating the SEC Review of Commercial Banks: Evidence from Comment Letters," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 30(1), pages 234-246.
  • Handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-09-00371
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.accessecon.com/Pubs/EB/2010/Volume30/EB-10-V30-I1-P20.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Securities and Exchange Commission; SEC; Financial Reporting; Annual Reports; 10K; Commercial Banks; Banking; Regulation.;

    JEL classification:

    • L5 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy
    • M4 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-09-00371. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (John P. Conley). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.