IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/diw/diwwob/77-48-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Erneuerbare Energien: Brandenburg im Ländervergleich weiter vorn - Thüringen holt auf

Author

Listed:
  • Jochen Diekmann
  • Felix Groba

Abstract

Die Energiewirtschaft befindet sich in einem gravierenden Umbau. Erneuerbare Energien expandieren stark. Längerfristig könnten sie zur Hauptquelle der Energieversorgung werden und damit wesentlich zum Klimaschutz, zur Schonung erschöpfbarer Ressourcen und zur Versorgungssicherheit beitragen. Die Bundesländer spielen bei der Weiterentwicklung erneuerbarer Energien eine wichtige Rolle. Sie setzen eigene Ausbauziele, führen Förderprogramme durch und beeinflussen die Entwicklung maßgeblich durch die Gestaltung rechtlicher und administrativer Rahmenbedingungen. Zum Vergleich der Anstrengungen und Erfolge der Bundesländer hat das DIW Berlin im Auftrag der Agentur für Erneuerbare Energien e.V. ein umfangreiches Indikatorensystem weiterentwickelt und aktualisiert. Auf dieser Grundlage ist im November der Preis "Leitstern 2010" in der Gesamtbewertung - wie schon 2008 - an das Land Brandenburg verliehen worden. Thüringen hat seit 2008 stark aufgeholt und liegt nun auf dem zweiten Platz. Jedoch müssen alle Bundesländer ihr Engagement noch verstärken, damit die längerfristigen Ausbauziele für erneuerbare Energien erreicht werden.

Suggested Citation

  • Jochen Diekmann & Felix Groba, 2010. "Erneuerbare Energien: Brandenburg im Ländervergleich weiter vorn - Thüringen holt auf," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 77(48), pages 2-8.
  • Handle: RePEc:diw:diwwob:77-48-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.364141.de/10-48-1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Harald Hau, 2006. "The Role of Transaction Costs for Financial Volatility: Evidence from the Paris Bourse," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 4(4), pages 862-890, June.
    2. Atkins, Allen B & Dyl, Edward A, 1997. " Transactions Costs and Holding Periods for Common Stocks," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 52(1), pages 309-325, March.
    3. Jones, Charles M & Seguin, Paul J, 1997. "Transaction Costs and Price Volatility: Evidence from Commission Deregulation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 87(4), pages 728-737, September.
    4. Lukas Menkhoff & Mark P. Taylor, 2007. "The Obstinate Passion of Foreign Exchange Professionals: Technical Analysis," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, pages 936-972.
    5. Carol L. Clark, 2010. "Controlling risk in a lightning-speed trading environment," Chicago Fed Letter, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, issue Feb.
    6. Badi Baltagi & Dong Li & Qi Li, 2006. "Transaction tax and stock market behavior: evidence from an emerging market," Empirical Economics, Springer, pages 393-408.
    7. Carol L. Clark, 2010. "Controlling risk in a lightning-speed trading environment," Policy Discussion Paper Series PDP-2010-01, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
    8. Gregor Dorfleitner, 2004. "How short-termed is the trading behaviour in Eurex futures markets?," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, pages 1269-1279.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Energy policy; Renewable energy; Composite indicators;

    JEL classification:

    • Q42 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Alternative Energy Sources
    • Q48 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Government Policy
    • C43 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Index Numbers and Aggregation
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:diw:diwwob:77-48-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bibliothek). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/diwbede.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.