IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/diw/diwvjh/87-1-10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nachhaltigkeitsawards – ein politisches Instrument der individuellen Verhaltensbeeinflussung?

Author

Listed:
  • Beate Gebhardt

Abstract

Awards single out the best participants of a competition. They are a simple and mostly positive signal to reward excellence, to improve transparency, and to create impetus for improvement and imitation. In this sense, sustainability awards are political instruments to stimulate sustainable behaviour. Influencing individual decision into certain directions without constraint is defined as „nudging“. This paper analyses the way consumers and businesses perceive sustainability awards and how their behaviour changes through them. To this end, I collected data from copious studies. Businesses are significantly better informed about the existing types of sustainability awards. They have great interest in receiving well-established and credible sustainability awards while hoping for an image boost. Consumers lack knowledge of sustainability awards. Nonetheless, awards represent credible indicators for sustainable business behaviour. Businesses with awards are more likeable and achieve higher sales. Preise (awards) stellen im Rahmen eines Wettbewerbs aus dem Teilnehmerfeld den Besten heraus. Sie sind damit ein vereinfachtes, meist positives Signal, damit soll belohnt, Transparenz erhöht sowie Verbesserungs- und Nachahmeffekte erzielt werden. In diesem Sinne ist ein Nachhaltigkeitsaward ein Instrument, das zu nachhaltigem Verhalten anregen möchte. Eine solche zwangsfreie Beeinflussung individueller Entscheidungen in eine bestimmte Richtung kann als „Nudging“ verstanden werden. Der Beitrag widmet sich der Frage,wie Nachhaltigkeitsawards von der Zivilgesellschaft und Unternehmen wahrgenommen werden und wie sie deren Verhalten beeinflussen. Zu diesem Zweck werden Erkenntnisse aus verschiedenen Studien zusammengetragen. Unternehmen sind sehr viel besser als Verbraucherinnen und Verbraucher darüber informiert, welche Nachhaltigkeitsawards existieren. Sie haben großes Interesse an der Auszeichnung mit einem gut etablierten und glaubwürdigen Nachhaltigkeitsaward und setzen auf einen Imagegewinn. Trotz fehlender Kenntnisse gelten Nachhaltigkeitsawards auch bei Verbraucherinnen und Verbrauchern als glaubwürdiger Indikator einer nachhaltigen Wirtschaftsweise. Ausgezeichnete Unternehmen profitieren von Sympathie und einem gesteigerten Kaufverhalten.

Suggested Citation

  • Beate Gebhardt, 2018. "Nachhaltigkeitsawards – ein politisches Instrument der individuellen Verhaltensbeeinflussung?," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 87(1), pages 133-153.
  • Handle: RePEc:diw:diwvjh:87-1-10
    DOI: 10.3790/vjh.87.1.133
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3790/vjh.87.1.133
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3790/vjh.87.1.133?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Awards; behavioural economics; nudging; sustainability;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H19 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - Other
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • O17 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Formal and Informal Sectors; Shadow Economy; Institutional Arrangements
    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:diw:diwvjh:87-1-10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bibliothek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/diwbede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.