IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dem/demres/v53y2025i9.html

Where do we go from here? Partnership-parenthood trajectories of cohabitation as first union during young adulthood in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Wenxuan Huang

    (Johns Hopkins University)

  • Jessica A. Kelley

    (Case Western Reserve University)

Abstract

Background: There has been considerable discussion about the role of cohabitation in family formation since the rise of cohabitation trends in Western societies. However, empirical evidence on how cohabitation-initiated partnership-parenthood trajectories unfold within specific cohorts remains limited. Objective: This study aims to identify typical partnership-parenthood trajectories following cohabitation as a first union in young adulthood and to examine how the likelihood of entering each trajectory varies by sociodemographic characteristics. Methods: We used data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1997 (NLSY97) to construct 60-month partnership-parenthood sequences after cohabitation as a first union. We applied sequence analysis and cluster analysis to identify typical patterns and estimated multinomial logistic regression models to examine the associations between sociodemographic characteristics and cluster membership. Results: We identified six typical partnership-parenthood trajectories among young cohabiters. College-educated cohabiters were more likely to enter the marriage-bound trajectory with delayed childbearing. Racial/ethnic minorities were less likely to enter trajectories involving eventual marriage and were overrepresented in trajectories characterized by non-marital birth and relationship instability. Conclusions: Our findings show that there is no single dominant partnership-parenthood pattern, indicating that cohabitation remains a liminal space between singlehood and marriage for the NLSY97 cohort. Sociodemographic differences are more pronounced in entry into certain trajectories than into others. Contribution: This study advances understanding of cohabitation’s role in family formation by offering a nuanced description of temporal patterns in partnership-parenthood trajectories. It also provides novel evidence for the “diverging destinies” thesis, highlighting how social inequality shapes early family formation.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenxuan Huang & Jessica A. Kelley, 2025. "Where do we go from here? Partnership-parenthood trajectories of cohabitation as first union during young adulthood in the United States," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 53(9), pages 245-260.
    • Handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:53:y:2025:i:9
    DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2025.53.9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol53/9/53-9.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4054/DemRes.2025.53.9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Esther O. Lamidi & Wendy D. Manning & Susan L. Brown, 2019. "Change in the Stability of First Premarital Cohabitation Among Women in the United States, 1983–2013," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 56(2), pages 427-450, April.
    2. Sara Mclanahan, 2004. "Diverging destinies: How children are faring under the second demographic transition," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 41(4), pages 607-627, November.
    3. Wendy D. Manning & Pamela J. Smock & Marshal Neal Fettro, 2019. "Cohabitation and Marital Expectations Among Single Millennials in the U.S," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 38(3), pages 327-346, June.
    4. Paola Di Giulio & Roberto Impicciatore & Maria Sironi, 2019. "The changing pattern of cohabitation: A sequence analysis approach," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 40(42), pages 1211-1248.
    5. Sara McLanahan, 2009. "Fragile Families and the Reproduction of Poverty," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 621(1), pages 111-131, January.
    6. Gabadinho, Alexis & Ritschard, Gilbert & Müller, Nicolas S & Studer, Matthias, 2011. "Analyzing and Visualizing State Sequences in R with TraMineR," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 40(i04).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emily Parker, 2021. "Gender Differences in the Marital Plans and Union Transitions of First Cohabitations," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 40(4), pages 673-694, August.
    2. Deirdre Bloome & Shannon Ang, 2020. "Marriage and Union Formation in the United States: Recent Trends Across Racial Groups and Economic Backgrounds," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 57(5), pages 1753-1786, October.
    3. Wendy D. Manning, 2020. "Young Adulthood Relationships in an Era of Uncertainty: A Case for Cohabitation," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 57(3), pages 799-819, June.
    4. Zachary Van Winkle & Anette Fasang, 2021. "The complexity of employment and family life courses across 20th century Europe: More evidence for larger cross-national differences but little change across 1916‒1966 birth cohorts," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 44(32), pages 775-810.
    5. Anette Fasang & Marcel Raab, 2014. "Beyond Transmission: Intergenerational Patterns of Family Formation Among Middle-Class American Families," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 51(5), pages 1703-1728, October.
    6. Sergi Vidal & Danilo Bolano & Mariona Lozano, 2026. "Partnership life courses and completed fertility in Spain," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 54(29), pages 935-972.
    7. Tom Kleinepier & Helga A. G. de Valk, 2016. "Ethnic differences in family trajectories of young adult women in the Netherlands: Timing and sequencing of events," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 35(24), pages 671-710.
    8. Paula England & Man Xu, 2025. "U.S. Women’s First Family-Forming Transitions to Cohabitation or Birth: Differences by Racial and Socioeconomic Disadvantage Challenge the Theory of the Second Demographic Transition," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 44(4), pages 1-35, August.
    9. Junna, Liina & Remes, Hanna & Murphy, Michael & Martikainen, Pekka, 2026. "Sibling complexity across childhood: a 16‐year follow‐up of the 1988 and 2000 birth cohorts in Finland," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 138716, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Doron Shiffer-Sebba & Hyunjoon Park, 2021. "US baby boomers’ homeownership trajectories across the life course: A Sequence Analysis approach," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 44(43), pages 1057-1072.
    11. Rannveig Kaldager Hart, 2019. "Union Histories of Dissolution: What Can They Say About Childlessness?," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 35(1), pages 101-131, February.
    12. Zachary Van Winkle, 2020. "Early Family Life Course Standardization in Sweden: The Role of Compositional Change," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 36(4), pages 765-798, September.
    13. Rachel Arocho, 2021. "“I Have No Idea:” Uncertainty in High School Seniors’ Marital Expectations," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 40(4), pages 771-793, August.
    14. Matthew R. Wright & Gwendolyn Zugarek & Susan L. Brown & Wendy D. Manning, 2025. "A Cohort Comparison of Relationship Quality Among Cohabitors," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 44(6), pages 1-26, December.
    15. Alessandro Di Nallo, 2025. "The partnership context of first parenthood – and how it varies by parental class and birth cohort in the United Kingdom," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 53(16), pages 465-510.
    16. Alice Goisis & Jenny Chanfreau & Vanessa Moulton & George B. Ploubidis, 2023. "Only Children and Cognitive Ability in Childhood: A Cross‐Cohort Analysis over 50 Years in the United Kingdom," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 49(2), pages 319-349, June.
    17. Kelly Musick & Pilar Gonalons‐Pons & Christine R. Schwartz, 2022. "Change and Variation in U.S. Couples’ Earnings Equality Following Parenthood," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 48(2), pages 413-443, June.
    18. Emanuela Struffolino & Michele Raitano, 2020. "Early-Career Complexity Before and After Labour-Market Deregulation in Italy: Heterogeneity by Gender and Socio-economic Status Across Cohorts," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 151(1), pages 231-257, August.
    19. Aron Lindberg & Nicholas Berente & James Gaskin & Kalle Lyytinen, 2016. "Coordinating Interdependencies in Online Communities: A Study of an Open Source Software Project," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 751-772, December.
    20. Carla Rowold & Martin Gädecke & Zachary Van Winkle, 2025. "Rethinking children’s family complexity: a multi-conceptual approach with dynamic sequence analysis and fixed effects models," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2025-022, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:53:y:2025:i:9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.demogr.mpg.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.