Author
Abstract
Feedback in English writing plays an important role in promoting the development of students’ writing ability. As one of the feedback forms, dialogic feedback has been gradually integrated into the new teaching concept of EFL writing. This study investigates learners’ attitudes toward dialogic feedback compared with written feedback and passive oral feedback. The characteristics of dialogic interaction are observed. The effectiveness of dialogic feedback and the influence of learners’ second language ability and instructors’ noticing strategies on the quality of feedback are discussed. It especially covers the differences of learners’ focus on writing (content, organization, grammar and language) in the process of feedback. Based on the one-to-one peer feedback model of the English writing center of Nantong University, this study collects data from 65 undergraduates through feedback corpus, questionnaire survey and semi-structured interview. The results show that most learners have a positive attitude towards dialogic feedback, which can to a certain degree improve their L2 writing. The higher the learners’ L2 proficiency, the more effective the dialogic feedback is. It is also helpful to improve the quantity and quality of dialogic feedback that the tutor uses the appropriate noticing strategy. These findings not only confirm the effectiveness of dialogic feedback, but also help teachers to use dialogic feedback reasonably and improve the effectiveness of feedback in English writing class.
Suggested Citation
Jin Zhang, 2023.
"A Study on the Effectiveness of Dialogic Feedback in English Writing,"
Journal of Linguistics and Communication Studies, Pioneer Academic Publishing Limited, vol. 2(3), pages 81-92, September.
Handle:
RePEc:cvg:joulcs:v:2:y:2023:i:3:p:81-92
DOI: 10.56397/JLCS.2023.09.11
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- L2 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cvg:joulcs:v:2:y:2023:i:3:p:81-92. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.pioneerpublisher.com/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.