IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/reveco/v35y2017i01p105-146_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Private Lenders, Banks And Mortgage Credit In Peru. Evidence From Notarised Loans

Author

Listed:
  • Zegarra, Luis Felipe

Abstract

This article examines the mortgage credit market of Peru during the guano era and analyses the effects of the creation of mortgage banks on the allocation of credit. It shows that mortgage banks served as interregional intermediaries and facilitated access to long-term credit for large estate owners. However, banks did not broaden access to credit. As private lenders, mortgage banks loaned largely to Lima’s merchants and renters and to hacendados from the main coastal valleys.

Suggested Citation

  • Zegarra, Luis Felipe, 2017. "Private Lenders, Banks And Mortgage Credit In Peru. Evidence From Notarised Loans," Revista de Historia Económica / Journal of Iberian and Latin American Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 35(1), pages 105-146, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:reveco:v:35:y:2017:i:01:p:105-146_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0212610916000082/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zegarra, Luis Felipe, 2017. "Usury laws and private credit in Lima, Peru. Evidence from notarized records," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 68-93.
    2. Luis FELIPE Zegarra, 2016. "Political instability and non-price loan terms in Lima, Peru: evidence from notarized contracts," European Review of Economic History, European Historical Economics Society, vol. 20(4), pages 478-525.
    3. Luis Felipe Zegarra, 2020. "Living Costs and Real Wages in Nineteenth Century Lima: Levels and International Comparisons," Australian Economic History Review, Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(2), pages 186-219, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:reveco:v:35:y:2017:i:01:p:105-146_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/rhe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.