A Case for Registering Studies of Political Outcomes: An Application in the 2010 House Elections
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Garret Christensen & Edward Miguel, 2018.
"Transparency, Reproducibility, and the Credibility of Economics Research,"
Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 56(3), pages 920-980, September.
- Garret S. Christensen & Edward Miguel, 2016. "Transparency, Reproducibility, and the Credibility of Economics Research," NBER Working Papers 22989, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Christensen, Garret & Miguel, Edward & Sturdy, Jennifer, 2017. "Transparency, Reproducibility, and the Credibility of Economics Research," MetaArXiv 9a3rw, Center for Open Science.
- Christensen, Garret & Miguel, Edward, 2017. "Transparency, Reproducibility, and the Credibility of Economics Research," Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt52h6x1cq, Department of Economics, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
- Lucas C. Coffman & Muriel Niederle, 2015. "Pre-analysis Plans Have Limited Upside, Especially Where Replications Are Feasible," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 29(3), pages 81-98, Summer.
- Christian Leuz, 2018.
"Evidence-based policymaking: promise, challenges and opportunities for accounting and financial markets research,"
Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(5), pages 582-608, July.
- Leuz, Christian, 2018. "Evidence-based policymaking: Promise, challenges and opportunities for accounting and financial markets research," CFS Working Paper Series 611, Center for Financial Studies (CFS).
- Christian Leuz, 2018. "Evidence-Based Policymaking: Promise, Challenges and Opportunities for Accounting and Financial Markets Research," NBER Working Papers 24535, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Sarah A. Janzen & Jeffrey D. Michler, 2021.
"Ulysses' pact or Ulysses' raft: Using pre‐analysis plans in experimental and nonexperimental research,"
Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(4), pages 1286-1304, December.
- Janzen, Sarah & Michler, Jeffrey D, 2020. "Ulysses' Pact or Ulysses' Raft: Using Pre-Analysis Plans in Experimental and Non-Experimental Research," MetaArXiv wkmht, Center for Open Science.
- Thees F Spreckelsen & Mariska Van Der Horst, 2016. "Is Banning Significance Testing the Best Way to Improve Applied Social Science Research? – Questions on Gorard (2016)," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 21(3), pages 95-105, August.
- Benjamin A. T. Graham & Jacob R. Tucker, 2019. "The international political economy data resource," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 149-161, March.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:polals:v:21:y:2013:i:01:p:21-37_01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pan .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.