IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/maorev/v8y2012i02p311-340_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Executives' Assessments of International Joint Ventures in China: A Multi-Theoretical Investigation

Author

Listed:
  • Reuer, Jeffrey J.
  • Tyler, Beverly B.
  • Tong, Tony W.
  • Wu, Cheng-Wei

Abstract

Despite the rich set of theories that have developed on international joint ventures (IJVs), little is known about what theoretical criteria senior executives actually incorporate in their judgments of IJV opportunities and partners. Empirical studies have often applied individual theories in a particularistic fashion, rather than recognizing the different theoretical perspectives that boundedly-rational executives may incorporate into their decision models. In this article, we combine decision criteria associated with multiple theories rooted in organizational economics to investigate how top executives process information on IJV opportunities in China. Using an established experimental technique known as policy capturing, we examine how executives cognitively weigh criteria from four prominent theories when making initial assessments of IJVs (i.e., the resource-based view, transaction cost economics, information economics, and real options theory). Our arguments and findings on executives' IJV decision models contribute to decision-making research on alliances and IJVs in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Reuer, Jeffrey J. & Tyler, Beverly B. & Tong, Tony W. & Wu, Cheng-Wei, 2012. "Executives' Assessments of International Joint Ventures in China: A Multi-Theoretical Investigation," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(2), pages 311-340, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:maorev:v:8:y:2012:i:02:p:311-340_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1740877600002904/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yu Xie & Yi-Fei Du & Francis Boadu & Xuan-Ya Shi, 2018. "Executives’ Assessments of Evolutionary and Leapfrog Modes: An Ambidexterity Explanation Logic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    2. Shuo Wang & Yuhui Gao & Gerard Hodgkinson & Denise Rousseau & Patrick Flood, 2015. "Opening the Black Box of CSR Decision Making: A Policy-Capturing Study of Charitable Donation Decisions in China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 128(3), pages 665-683, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:maorev:v:8:y:2012:i:02:p:311-340_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/mor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.