IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jwecon/v18y2023i4p286-301_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Apples to advocacy: Evaluating consumer preferences for hard cider policies

Author

Listed:
  • Staples, Aaron J.
  • Howard, Philip H.
  • Conner, David S.
  • Sirrine, J. Robert
  • Ostrom, Marcia R.
  • Miller, Michelle

Abstract

Hard cider is a sector of a maturing craft beverage industry that continues to experience growth in the United States. Cider is also experiencing challenges, however, such as competition from other alcohol markets, changing consumer preferences, the supply chain, and inflationary pressures. National policy changes may help promote more optimal outcomes for this sector, but public support is important to policy formation. This study uses survey data from a best-worst scaling experiment of consumers in four leading cider-producing states (Michigan, Washington, Wisconsin, and Vermont) to understand preferences toward ten broad cider policy initiatives. The results of multinomial logistic modeling reveal that consumers prefer policies mandating ingredients, nutrition facts, and allergen labeling across all ciders. The least preferred policy initiatives include allowing producers to use vintage on labeling and funding regional cider development. These results have important implications for stakeholders across the industry, including the benefits of labeling disclosures in marketing and the need to improve public awareness of barriers to cider industry development.

Suggested Citation

  • Staples, Aaron J. & Howard, Philip H. & Conner, David S. & Sirrine, J. Robert & Ostrom, Marcia R. & Miller, Michelle, 2023. "Apples to advocacy: Evaluating consumer preferences for hard cider policies," Journal of Wine Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(4), pages 286-301, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jwecon:v:18:y:2023:i:4:p:286-301_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1931436123000299/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jwecon:v:18:y:2023:i:4:p:286-301_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jwe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.