IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v27y2021i4p736-750_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A study of Aotearoa New Zealand enterprises: how different are Indigenous enterprises?

Author

Listed:
  • Haar, Jarrod
  • Martin, William John
  • Ruckstuhl, Katharina
  • Ruwhiu, Diane
  • Daellenbach, Urs
  • Ghafoor, Azka

Abstract

Indigenous literature suggests Māori businesses are distinct within Aotearoa New Zealand, due to facing unique challenges and having different operating preferences. It could also be argued that Māori and non-Māori enterprises in the private, public and not-for-profit sectors are identical as a function of operating in similar markets. However, there is a paucity of empirical evidence, and the present article rectifies this with a study of 230 Aotearoa enterprises, including 24 Māori. We test differences and find Māori enterprises report higher cultural capital, which relates to employees' knowledge and skills towards working with and respecting cultural values. However, we find no differences across human capital, relational capital, entrepreneurial culture, and organisational performance. The findings suggest that apart from a culturally specific factor, Māori and non-Māori enterprises appear to be similarly enabled, which provides a useful benchmark for understanding Māori business. We discuss the implications for research.

Suggested Citation

  • Haar, Jarrod & Martin, William John & Ruckstuhl, Katharina & Ruwhiu, Diane & Daellenbach, Urs & Ghafoor, Azka, 2021. "A study of Aotearoa New Zealand enterprises: how different are Indigenous enterprises?," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(4), pages 736-750, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:27:y:2021:i:4:p:736-750_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367221000067/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:27:y:2021:i:4:p:736-750_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.