IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v26y2020i1p29-51_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Could the aging workforce reduce the agency penalty for female leaders? Re-examining the think manager–think male stereotype

Author

Listed:
  • Scheuer, Cara-Lynn
  • Loughlin, Catherine

Abstract

Older workers make up a substantial portion of today’s labor force. Yet little is known about the beliefs held by this age group. Our study offers some much needed insights into intersectionality around this group, by investigating how older workers’ perceptions of supervisors performing a gendered leadership behavior are impacted by a supervisors’ sex, age, and gendered attributes. The results show that these supervisors are perceived most favorably when they possess communal qualities and/or when they are depicted as being older than their direct reports. Our results also reveal that, when these supervisors are not perceived as communal, male but not female supervisors, experience a backlash. Within this context, young female leaders appear to be at an advantage when compared with young male leaders. This study advances the literature on the ‘think manager–think male’ stereotype and has the practical benefit of offering insights into leader-follower interactions in today’s aging workplace.

Suggested Citation

  • Scheuer, Cara-Lynn & Loughlin, Catherine, 2020. "Could the aging workforce reduce the agency penalty for female leaders? Re-examining the think manager–think male stereotype," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(1), pages 29-51, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:26:y:2020:i:1:p:29-51_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S183336721800041X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:26:y:2020:i:1:p:29-51_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.