IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v23y2017i03p392-404_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What about ‘MEE’: A Measure of Employee Entitlement and the impact on reciprocity in the workplace

Author

Listed:
  • Westerlaken, Kristie M
  • Jordan, Peter J
  • Ramsay, Sheryl

Abstract

A basic underlying assumption of the psychological contract is that both parties come to a mutual agreement about the expectations and obligations of a contract of employment. Recent research provides evidence of the potential for employees to develop unrealistic expectations from this contract and this has been described as a sense of entitlement. In this article, we outline two studies. In the first study, we test the internal structure and reliability of a scale we developed and named the Measure of Employee Entitlement. In the second study, we test the predictive validity of the Measure of Employee Entitlement against a measure of reciprocity. The development and validation of the Measure of Employee Entitlement extends our knowledge of sense of entitlement in the workplace and situates entitlement as a factor that may impact on the development of psychological contracts. This research provides a platform from which researchers and practitioners can continue to coherently and consistently investigate the phenomenon of employee entitlement.

Suggested Citation

  • Westerlaken, Kristie M & Jordan, Peter J & Ramsay, Sheryl, 2017. "What about ‘MEE’: A Measure of Employee Entitlement and the impact on reciprocity in the workplace," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(3), pages 392-404, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:23:y:2017:i:03:p:392-404_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367216000055/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:23:y:2017:i:03:p:392-404_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.