IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v22y2016i02p154-172_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Subculture by autonomy and group cohesion and its effect on job satisfaction of R&D professionals in an R&D organization

Author

Listed:
  • Jung, Jaehwan
  • Nam, Changi
  • Lee, Euehun
  • Kim, Seongcheol

Abstract

Professional research and development (R&D) organizations typically employ highly educated professionals to work on a range of creative, intellectual projects in their chosen fields. In these organizations, organizational culture and subculture are critical factors connected with project success. This paper explores the existence of subcultures and the factors that contribute to subcultures within a professional R&D organization, and examines subcultural effects on the job satisfaction of R&D professionals to suggest a suitable cultural type for professional R&D organizations. Autonomy and group cohesion are considered, so grid–group theory is applied to measure R&D culture. The subjects were 285 full-time researchers who had worked at the Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute, an international IT institution, for over 5 years. Differences were found in organizational culture according to the research fields and types (applied and developmental research). The egalitarian culture type (low grid, high group) is found to be suitable for improving job satisfaction in R&D organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Jung, Jaehwan & Nam, Changi & Lee, Euehun & Kim, Seongcheol, 2016. "Subculture by autonomy and group cohesion and its effect on job satisfaction of R&D professionals in an R&D organization," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(2), pages 154-172, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:22:y:2016:i:02:p:154-172_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367215000206/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. George Adrian Bilcan, 2019. "The Motivational Aspects of Leadership Development: A literature review," Academic Journal of Economic Studies, Faculty of Finance, Banking and Accountancy Bucharest,"Dimitrie Cantemir" Christian University Bucharest, vol. 5(3), pages 132-137, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:22:y:2016:i:02:p:154-172_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.