IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jnlpup/v34y2014i02p303-329_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fiscal federalism and American exceptionalism: why is there no federal equalisation system in the United States?

Author

Listed:
  • Béland, Daniel
  • Lecours, André

Abstract

This article addresses the absence of a federal equalisation programme in the United States, which is a significant aspect of “American exceptionalism†. Comparing the United States with Australia and Canada, we argue that three factors are relevant when accounting for this absence. On one hand, we turn to two societal factors to explain why there was never much political appetite for the creation of a stand-alone equalisation programme in the United States, namely the lack of a direct threat to the territorial integrity of the United States after 1865 and the comparative weakness of the idea of social citizenship in that country. On the other hand, our analysis shows that key institutional features of American political institutions, particularly strong bicameralism combined with the absence of formal party discipline, help illuminate why it would have been difficult to create an equalisation programme even if there had been some societal pressures to do so.

Suggested Citation

  • Béland, Daniel & Lecours, André, 2014. "Fiscal federalism and American exceptionalism: why is there no federal equalisation system in the United States?," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 34(2), pages 303-329, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jnlpup:v:34:y:2014:i:02:p:303-329_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0143814X14000038/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mueller Sean & Vatter Adrian & Schmid Charlie, 2016. "Self-Interest or Solidarity?," Statistics, Politics and Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1-2), pages 3-28, December.
    2. Søren Frank Etzerodt & Niels Jørgen Mau Pedersen, 2024. "Formula-based Grants as Pork Barrel Politics: Targetability and the Political-strategic Use of Grants," Munich Papers in Political Economy 34, Munich School of Politics and Public Policy and the School of Management at the Technical University of Munich.
    3. Tiffany H. Morrison & W. Neil Adger & Katrina Brown & Maria Carmen Lemos & Dave Huitema & Terry P. Hughes, 2017. "Mitigation and adaptation in polycentric systems: sources of power in the pursuit of collective goals," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(5), September.
    4. Giorgio Brosio, 2017. "Equalization transfers and convergence between federal and unitary systems: A contribution to their historical analysis," ECONOMIA PUBBLICA, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(3), pages 21-66.
    5. Giorgio Brosio, 2017. "Equalization transfers and convergence between federal and unitary systems: a contribution to their historical analysis," Working papers 61, Società Italiana di Economia Pubblica.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jnlpup:v:34:y:2014:i:02:p:303-329_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pup .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.