IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jnlpup/v32y2012i02p117-139_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding institutional conversion: the case of the National Reporting and Learning System

Author

Listed:
  • Dodds, Anneliese
  • Kodate, Naonori

Abstract

This article focuses on one type of institutional change: conversion. One innovative approach to institutional change, the “political-coalitional approach†, acknowledges that: institutions can have unintended effects, which may privilege certain groups over others; institutions are often created and sustained through compromise with external actors; and institutions’ external context can vary significantly over time, as different coalitions’ power waxes and wanes. This approach helps explain the conversion of one institution drawn from the UK National Health Service, the National Reporting and Learning System. However, the shift of this system from producing formative information to facilitate learning to promote safer care, towards producing summative information to support resource allocation decisions, cannot be explained merely by examining the actions of external power coalitions. An internal focus, which considers factors that are normally viewed as “organisational†(such as leadership and internal stability), is also required.

Suggested Citation

  • Dodds, Anneliese & Kodate, Naonori, 2012. "Understanding institutional conversion: the case of the National Reporting and Learning System," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(2), pages 117-139, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jnlpup:v:32:y:2012:i:02:p:117-139_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0143814X12000037/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Price, Tristan & Tredinnick-Rowe, John & Walshe, Kieran & Tazzyman, Abigail & Ferguson, Jane & Boyd, Alan & Archer, Julian & Bryce, Marie, 2020. "Reviving clinical governance? A qualitative study of the impact of professional regulatory reform on clinical governance in healthcare organisations in England," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(4), pages 446-453.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jnlpup:v:32:y:2012:i:02:p:117-139_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pup .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.