IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jnlpup/v25y2005i03p289-311_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Europe from the Bottom: Assessing Personal Gains and Losses and its Effects on EU Support

Author

Listed:
  • MAU, STEFFEN

Abstract

Numerous authors have highlighted utilitarian considerations as sources of public support for the European Union, suggesting that support results primarily from cost-benefit calculations of the gains and losses associated with integration. Benefits accrue, not only to different member states, but also to individuals. Within this discussion it is often suggested that the gains and losses are unevenly distributed across social groups, with the higher status groups being privileged and the lower status groups disadvantaged. This paper challenges arguments that assume a clear division between lower social strata and higher social strata in terms of winning and losing in Europeanization; it looks more closely at how Europeans rate the integration process as it affects them personally, and how this influences their support for integration. The results show that socio-economic characteristics cannot fully explain people's perceptions of being winners or losers, and a large proportion of EU citizens do not consider themselves either winners or losers. The paper also demonstrates that the winner/loser self-characterization is indeed a major determinant of support for the EU, but that it only partly coincides with people's socio-economic position.

Suggested Citation

  • Mau, Steffen, 2005. "Europe from the Bottom: Assessing Personal Gains and Losses and its Effects on EU Support," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(3), pages 289-311, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jnlpup:v:25:y:2005:i:03:p:289-311_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0143814X05000346/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bruno Arpino & Anastassia V. Obydenkova, 2020. "Democracy and Political Trust Before and After the Great Recession 2008: The European Union and the United Nations," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 148(2), pages 395-415, April.
    2. Zuzana Ringlerova, 2015. "Weathering the crisis: Evidence of diffuse support for the EU from a six-wave Dutch panel," European Union Politics, , vol. 16(4), pages 558-576, December.
    3. Ritzen, Jo & Zimmermann, Klaus F. & Wehner, Caroline, 2014. "Euroskepticism in the Crisis: More Mood than Economy," IZA Discussion Papers 8001, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    4. Zuzana Ringlerova, 2022. "The Impact of Immigration on Attitudes toward the EU: Evidence from a Three‐Country Survey Experiment," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(2), pages 391-407, March.
    5. Raul Gomez, 2015. "The Economy Strikes Back: Support for the EU during the Great Recession," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 577-592, May.
    6. Juan J Fernández & Monika Eigmüller & Stefanie Börner, 2016. "Domestic transnationalism and the formation of pro-European sentiments," European Union Politics, , vol. 17(3), pages 457-481, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jnlpup:v:25:y:2005:i:03:p:289-311_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pup .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.