IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jinsec/v16y2020i3p369-387_8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Give us a little social credit: to design or to discover personal ratings in the era of Big Data

Author

Listed:
  • Devereaux, Abigail
  • Peng, Linan

Abstract

In 2014, the State Council of the Chinese Communist Party announced the institution of a social credit system by 2020, a follow-up to a similar statement on the creation of a social credit system issued by the State Council in 2007. Social credit ratings of the type being developed by the State Council in partnership with Chinese companies go beyond existing financial credit ratings in an attempt to project less-tangible personal characteristics like trustworthiness, criminal tendencies, and group loyalty onto a single scale. The emergence of personal credit ratings is enabled by Big Data, automated decision-making processes, machine learning, and facial recognition technology. It is quite likely that various kinds of personal and social credit ratings shall become reality in the near future. We explore China's version of its social credit system so far, compare the welfare and epistemological qualities of an ecology of personal ratings emanating from polycentric sources versus a social credit rating, and discuss whether a social credit system in an ideologically driven state is less a tool to maximize social welfare through trustworthiness provision and more a method of preventing and punishing deviance from a set of party-held ideological values.

Suggested Citation

  • Devereaux, Abigail & Peng, Linan, 2020. "Give us a little social credit: to design or to discover personal ratings in the era of Big Data," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(3), pages 369-387, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jinsec:v:16:y:2020:i:3:p:369-387_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1744137419000754/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Linan Peng & Justin T. Callais, 2023. "The authoritarian trade‐off: A synthetic control analysis of development and social coercion in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 41(2), pages 370-387, April.
    2. Ryan H. Murphy, 2023. "State capacity, economic freedom, and classical liberalism," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 165-187, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jinsec:v:16:y:2020:i:3:p:369-387_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/joi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.