IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jfinqa/v39y2004i02p277-304_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Third Market Reforms: The Overlooked Goal of the SEC's Order Handling Rules

Author

Listed:
  • Odders-White, Elizabeth R.

Abstract

In 1997, the Securities and Exchange Commission enacted significant reforms in U.S. markets. Several studies document that the new order handling rules increased competition for Nasdaq stocks, but the reforms were designed with an additional goal in mind—to increase quote competition for the trading of NYSE-listed securities on Nasdaq (i.e., third market trading). An evaluation of the reforms in the third market indicates that they did not achieve this objective. Instead, both quote quality and quoting frequency were diminished, due primarily to elimination of the excess spread rule. This suggests that more significant changes are needed to increase inter-exchange competition.

Suggested Citation

  • Odders-White, Elizabeth R., 2004. "Third Market Reforms: The Overlooked Goal of the SEC's Order Handling Rules," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 39(2), pages 277-304, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:39:y:2004:i:02:p:277-304_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022109000003070/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Castelle, Michael & Millo, Yuval & Beunza, Daniel & Lubin, David C., 2016. "Where do electronic markets come from? Regulation and the transformation of financial exchanges," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 68650, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Pankaj K. Jain & Jang‐Chul Kim, 2006. "Investor Recognition, Liquidity, and Exchange Listings in the Reformed Markets," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 35(2), pages 21-42, June.
    3. S. Ghon Rhee & Ning Tang, 2013. "Can quote competition reduce preferenced trading? A reexamination of the SEC’s 1997 order handling rules," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 53(1), pages 243-264, March.
    4. David Porter & Yusif Simaan & Daniel Weaver & David Whitcomb, 2006. "Effect of the Actual Size Rule Under Market Stress," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 87-103, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:39:y:2004:i:02:p:277-304_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jfq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.