IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jbcoan/v14y2023is1p181-205_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Benefit–Cost Analysis of Increased Funding for Agricultural Research and Development in the Global South

Author

Listed:
  • Rosegrant, Mark W.
  • Wong, Brad
  • Sulser, Timothy B.
  • Dubosse, Nancy
  • Lybbert, Travis J.

Abstract

This paper conducts a benefit–cost analysis of expanding agricultural research and development (R&D) in the Global South. We extend a recent modeling exercise that used IFPRI’s IMPACT model to estimate the investments required to reduce the global prevalence of hunger below 5%. After 35 years, the increased funding is estimated to increase agricultural output by 10%, reduce the prevalence of hunger by 35%, reduce food prices by 16%, and increase per capita incomes by 4% relative to a counterfactual where funding continues to rise on historical trends. Using an 8% discount rate, the net present value of the costs of agricultural R&D are estimated at $61 billion for the next 35 years, while the net present benefits in terms of net economic surplus (the sum of consumer and producer surplus) are estimated at $2.1 trillion. The central estimate of the benefit–cost ratio (BCR) is 33, consistent with previous research documenting high average returns to agricultural research and development. The central BCR reported in this study places the intervention at the 91st percentile of all previous Copenhagen Consensus BCRs in agriculture, and 87th percentile for all BCRs regardless of sector. Agricultural R&D is likely one of the best uses of resources for the remainder of the Sustainable Development Goals and decades beyond.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosegrant, Mark W. & Wong, Brad & Sulser, Timothy B. & Dubosse, Nancy & Lybbert, Travis J., 2023. "Benefit–Cost Analysis of Increased Funding for Agricultural Research and Development in the Global South," Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(S1), pages 181-205, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jbcoan:v:14:y:2023:i:s1:p:181-205_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2194588823000271/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jbcoan:v:14:y:2023:i:s1:p:181-205_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/bca .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.