IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/intorg/v69y2015i01p195-217_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Human Rights, Geostrategy, and EU Foreign Policy, 1989–2008

Author

Listed:
  • Kreutz, Joakim

Abstract

Is foreign policy influenced by humanitarian concerns, or are concepts such as human security merely rhetoric for traditional power politics? Using a multilevel modeling technique and a unique data set of military and economic European Union (EU) intervention 1989–2008, I find that military and economic interventions by the EU are conducted in response to humanitarian atrocities but that geostrategic concerns also influence EU action. While the EU consistently is more likely to act against countries with greater civilian victimization, the size of the effect is influenced by spatial considerations. The EU is most attentive to human rights violations in non-EU European states, followed by countries in sub-Saharan Africa, while it has been least active in Asia and the Americas.

Suggested Citation

  • Kreutz, Joakim, 2015. "Human Rights, Geostrategy, and EU Foreign Policy, 1989–2008," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 69(1), pages 195-217, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:intorg:v:69:y:2015:i:01:p:195-217_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0020818314000368/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mark Furness & Stefan Gänzle, 2017. "The Security–Development Nexus in European Union Foreign Relations after Lisbon: Policy Coherence at Last?," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 35(4), pages 475-492, July.
    2. Daniela Donno & Michael Neureiter, 2018. "Can human rights conditionality reduce repression? Examining the European Union’s economic agreements," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 335-357, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:intorg:v:69:y:2015:i:01:p:195-217_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ino .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.