IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/intorg/v64y2010i01p65-96_99.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Constraining Coercion? Legitimacy and Its Role in U.S. Trade Policy, 1975–2000

Author

Listed:
  • Pelc, Krzysztof J.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Pelc, Krzysztof J., 2010. "Constraining Coercion? Legitimacy and Its Role in U.S. Trade Policy, 1975–2000," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 64(01), pages 65-96, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:intorg:v:64:y:2010:i:01:p:65-96_99
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0020818309990245
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John R. Oneal & Bruce Russett, 1999. "Assessing the Liberal Peace with Alternative Specifications: Trade Still Reduces Conflict," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 36(4), pages 423-442, July.
    2. Katherine Barbieri, 1996. "Economic Interdependence: A Path to Peace or a Source of Interstate Conflict?," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 33(1), pages 29-49, February.
    3. Philippe Martin & Thierry Mayer & Mathias Thoenig, 2008. "Make Trade Not War?," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 75(3), pages 865-900.
    4. Solomon William Polachek, 1980. "Conflict and Trade," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 24(1), pages 55-78, March.
    5. James D. Morrow, 1999. "How Could Trade Affect Conflict?," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 36(4), pages 481-489, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Tingle, 2015. "Bargaining Practice and Negotiation Failure in Russia-Ukraine Gas Relations," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1504, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    2. Moonhawk Kim, 2016. "Enduring trade disputes: Disguised protectionism and duration and recurrence of international trade disputes," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 283-310, September.
    3. Vincent Anesi & Giovanni Facchini, "undated". "Coercive Trade Policy," Development Working Papers 376, Centro Studi Luca d'Agliano, University of Milano.
    4. Barbara Dluhosch & Daniel Horgos, 2013. "(When) Does Tit-for-tat Diplomacy in Trade Policy Pay Off?," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 155-179, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:intorg:v:64:y:2010:i:01:p:65-96_99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Keith Waters). General contact details of provider: http://journals.cambridge.org/jid_INO .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.