IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/intorg/v53y1999i04p815-815_44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Case Studies and the Statistical Worldview: Erratum

Author

Listed:
  • McKeown, Timothy J.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • McKeown, Timothy J., 1999. "Case Studies and the Statistical Worldview: Erratum," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 53(4), pages 815-815, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:intorg:v:53:y:1999:i:04:p:815-815_44
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0020818399440913/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jack S. Levy, 2008. "Case Studies: Types, Designs, and Logics of Inference," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 25(1), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Sally A. Weller, 2007. "Discrimination, labour markets and the labour market prospects of older workers: what can a legal case teach us?," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 21(3), pages 417-437, September.
    3. Fairfield, Tasha & Charman, Andrew, 2017. "Explicit Bayesian analysis for process tracing: guidelines, opportunities, and caveats," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 69203, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Fairfield, Tasha & Charman, Andrew, 2019. "A Dialogue with the Data: the Bayesian foundations of iterative research in qualitative social science," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 89261, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. James Mahoney, 2012. "The Logic of Process Tracing Tests in the Social Sciences," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 41(4), pages 570-597, November.
    6. James Mahoney, 2000. "Strategies of Causal Inference in Small-N Analysis," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 28(4), pages 387-424, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:intorg:v:53:y:1999:i:04:p:815-815_44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ino .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.