IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/etheor/v31y2015i03p471-492_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nonparametric Tests Of Density Ratio Ordering

Author

Listed:
  • Beare, Brendan K.
  • Moon, Jong-Myun

Abstract

We study a family of nonparametric tests of density ratio ordering between two continuous probability distributions on the real line. Density ratio ordering is satisfied when the two distributions admit a nonincreasing density ratio. Equivalently, density ratio ordering is satisfied when the ordinal dominance curve associated with the two distributions is concave. To test this property, we consider statistics based on the Lp-distance between an empirical ordinal dominance curve and its least concave majorant. We derive the limit distribution of these statistics when density ratio ordering is satisfied. Further, we establish that, when 1 ≤ p ≤ 2, the limit distribution is stochastically largest when the two distributions are equal. When 2

Suggested Citation

  • Beare, Brendan K. & Moon, Jong-Myun, 2015. "Nonparametric Tests Of Density Ratio Ordering," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(3), pages 471-492, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:etheor:v:31:y:2015:i:03:p:471-492_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0266466614000401/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Horatio Cuesdeanu & Jens Carsten Jackwerth, 2018. "The pricing kernel puzzle in forward looking data," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 253-276, October.
    2. Pedro H. C. Sant’Anna, 2021. "Nonparametric Tests for Treatment Effect Heterogeneity With Duration Outcomes," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(3), pages 816-832, July.
    3. Hongyi Jiang & Zhenting Sun & Shiyun Hu, 2023. "A Nonparametric Test of $m$th-degree Inverse Stochastic Dominance," Papers 2306.12271, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2023.
    4. Graham Elliott & Nikolay Kudrin & Kaspar Wüthrich, 2022. "Detecting p‐Hacking," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 90(2), pages 887-906, March.
    5. Brodeur, Abel & Cook, Nikolai M. & Hartley, Jonathan S. & Heyes, Anthony, 2022. "Do Pre-Registration and Pre-analysis Plans Reduce p-Hacking and Publication Bias?," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1147, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    6. Andrews, Donald W.K. & Shi, Xiaoxia, 2017. "Inference based on many conditional moment inequalities," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 196(2), pages 275-287.
    7. Sangita Kulathinal & Isha Dewan, 2023. "Weighted U-statistics for likelihood-ratio ordering of bivariate data," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 64(2), pages 705-735, April.
    8. Xi Chen & Victor Chernozhukov & Iv'an Fern'andez-Val & Scott Kostyshak & Ye Luo, 2018. "Shape-Enforcing Operators for Point and Interval Estimators," Papers 1809.01038, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2021.
    9. Graham Elliott & Nikolay Kudrin & Kaspar Wuthrich, 2022. "The Power of Tests for Detecting $p$-Hacking," Papers 2205.07950, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2023.
    10. Beare, Brendan K. & Shi, Xiaoxia, 2019. "An improved bootstrap test of density ratio ordering," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 10(C), pages 9-26.
    11. Zheng Fang, 2021. "A Unifying Framework for Testing Shape Restrictions," Papers 2107.12494, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2021.
    12. Wang, Dewei & Tang, Chuan-Fa & Tebbs, Joshua M., 2020. "More powerful goodness-of-fit tests for uniform stochastic ordering," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    13. Brendan K. Beare & Jackson D. Clarke, 2022. "Modified Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests of stochastic dominance," Papers 2210.08892, arXiv.org.
    14. Seo, Juwon, 2018. "Tests of stochastic monotonicity with improved power," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 53-70.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:etheor:v:31:y:2015:i:03:p:471-492_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ect .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.