IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/buetqu/v10y2000i04p897-910_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Business Friends: Aristotle, Kant and Other Management Theorists on the Practice of Networking

Author

Listed:
  • Schonsheck, Jonathan

Abstract

Quite frequently, business periodicals feature articles on the importance of building and maintaining a “network†of business friends. Typically, these articles offer practical suggestions for “networking.†This article is a philosophical investigation of business friends, and business friendships. Relying upon Aristotle’s classic analysis, I argue that business friendships are instances of “incomplete friendships for utility.†Viewed in this way, much is revealed about what business friendships are; even more is revealed about what business friendships are not, It is perfectly natural to say that business friends use one another; this raises the issue of whether business friendships violate the Kantian “categorical imperative.†I argue that they need not, and that—so long as they are truly “friendships†—they do not. What this discussion makes clear, however, is that business friendships are in continuous peril of eroding into relationships that cannot survive moral scrutiny. I conclude with a few practical suggestions—and philosophical cautions.

Suggested Citation

  • Schonsheck, Jonathan, 2000. "Business Friends: Aristotle, Kant and Other Management Theorists on the Practice of Networking," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(4), pages 897-910, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:10:y:2000:i:04:p:897-910_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1052150X00001093/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Domènec Melé, 2009. "The Practice of Networking: An Ethical Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 90(4), pages 487-503, December.
    2. Ned Dobos, 2017. "Networking, Corruption, and Subversion," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 144(3), pages 467-478, September.
    3. repec:dau:papers:123456789/3995 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. repec:dau:papers:123456789/8678 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Claus Dierksmeier & Michael Pirson, 2009. "Oikonomia Versus Chrematistike: Learning from Aristotle About the Future Orientation of Business Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 88(3), pages 417-430, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:10:y:2000:i:04:p:897-910_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/beq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.