IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v107y2013i03p433-445_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quality of Government: Toward a More Complex Definition

Author

Listed:
  • AGNAFORS, MARCUS

Abstract

Concepts such as “quality of government†and “good governance†refer to a desired character of the exercise of public authority. Recently the interest in good governance, the quality of government, and similar concepts has increased considerably. However, despite this increasing interest and use, an adequate definition of the concept of quality of government has proved difficult to find. This article criticizes recent attempts at such a definition and proposes an alternative, more complex definition that includes moral content and also encompasses a plurality of values and virtues at its core. An acceptable definition of the quality of governance must be consistent with the demands of a public ethos, the virtues of good decision making and reason giving, the rule of law, efficiency, stability, and a principle of beneficence. The article describes these components in detail and the relations among them.

Suggested Citation

  • Agnafors, Marcus, 2013. "Quality of Government: Toward a More Complex Definition," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 107(3), pages 433-445, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:107:y:2013:i:03:p:433-445_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055413000191/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adel Daoud & Björn Halleröd & Debarati Guha-Sapir, 2016. "What Is the Association between Absolute Child Poverty, Poor Governance, and Natural Disasters? A Global Comparison of Some of the Realities of Climate Change," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Adel Daoud, 2015. "Quality of Governance, Corruption and Absolute Child Poverty in India," Journal of South Asian Development, , vol. 10(2), pages 148-167, August.
    3. Daniel Albalate & Germà Bel, 2018. "“Do government formation deadlocks damage economic growth? Evidence from history’s longest period of political deadlock”," IREA Working Papers 201817, University of Barcelona, Research Institute of Applied Economics, revised Jul 2018.
    4. Momi Dahan & Michel Strawczynski, 2020. "Budget institutions and government effectiveness," Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 32(2), pages 217-246, April.
    5. Cristina Bicchieri, 2002. "Covenants without Swords," Rationality and Society, , vol. 14(2), pages 192-228, May.
    6. Anja Shortland & Andrew Shortland, 2020. "Governance under the shadow of the law: trading high value fine art," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 184(1), pages 157-174, July.
    7. Luhao Liu & Xudong Hu & Zhongxiu Zhao, 2022. "Does Horizontal‐Paradigm Aid Weaken the Governance of Recipient Countries? Evidence from China," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 30(2), pages 1-27, March.
    8. Sunhee Kim & Jaesun Wang, 2019. "Does Quality of Government Matter in Public Health?: Comparing the Role of Quality and Quantity of Government at the National Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-24, June.
    9. Siudek, Tomasz & Zawojska, Aldona, 2014. "Quality of national governance and rural development: The case of the European Union countries," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182793, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Daniel Appiah & Abdul-Gafaru Abdulai, 2023. "Conceptualizing and Measuring State Effectiveness as Impartiality," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 1417-1436, December.
    11. Kimberly A. Nolan García & Mark Aspinwall, 2019. "Restraining Gulliver: Institutional reform and the strengthening of state capacity and compliance," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(3), pages 321-339, September.
    12. Tobin Im & Youngmi Choi, 2018. "Rethinking National Competitiveness: A Critical Assessment of Governmental Capacity Measures," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 135(2), pages 515-532, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:107:y:2013:i:03:p:433-445_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.