IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/agrerw/v33y2004i02p293-297_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Note on the Reliability Tests of Estimates from ARMS Data

Author

Listed:
  • Kim, C. S.
  • Hallahan, C.
  • Lindamood, W.
  • Schaible, G.
  • Payne, J.

Abstract

USDA uses the concept of “publish-ability†rather than statistical reliability of an estimate for quality validation of USDA estimates, which is solely based on the sample size and the coefficient of variation (CV). We demonstrate conceptually how the reliability of the sample mean can be tested by estimating the upper and lower bounds of the confidence interval for an unknown population mean using the CV. However, the reliability test for the sample mean can be made only under the normality assumption. USDA multiple-way Agricultural Resource Management Survey (ARMS) estimates are used to illustrate the relative measure of precision for sample-based estimators.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim, C. S. & Hallahan, C. & Lindamood, W. & Schaible, G. & Payne, J., 2004. "A Note on the Reliability Tests of Estimates from ARMS Data," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 33(2), pages 293-297, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:agrerw:v:33:y:2004:i:02:p:293-297_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1068280500005852/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:agrerw:v:33:y:2004:i:02:p:293-297_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/age .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.