IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cto/journl/v1y1981i2p339-371.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Taxation and Income Redistribution: An Unsympathetic Critique of Practice and Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Richard B. McKenzie

    (Clemson University)

Abstract

The United States has become to a considerable extent a redistrib- utive society. The taxing power of the state continues to be used to transfer massive amounts of purchasing power from those who earn their keep to those relatively few who are truly in need and to those relatively many who are skillful in finding ways to remain on the receiving end of government handouts. Many people now believe, and act as if, everyone can live at the expense of everyone else. As government welfare programs have expanded—or perhaps because of the expansion in those programs —democracy has been converted to a great extent into a competi- tive struggle over slices of the governmental welfare pie. The numerous groups who have an interest in the maintenance and ex- pansion of the welfare system must now scramble for money in the political arena, fearful that their budgets will be allotted to some- one else more skillful in securing political favors.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard B. McKenzie, 1981. "Taxation and Income Redistribution: An Unsympathetic Critique of Practice and Theory," Cato Journal, Cato Journal, Cato Institute, vol. 1(2), pages 339-371, Fall.
  • Handle: RePEc:cto:journl:v:1:y:1981:i:2:p:339-371
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/serials/files/cato-journal/1981/11/cj1n2-2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    taxation; income; income redistribution; government;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cto:journl:v:1:y:1981:i:2:p:339-371. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emily Ekins (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/catoous.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.