IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cto/journl/v1y1981i1p53-85.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Petroleum Industry: A Historical Study in Power

Author

Listed:
  • D.T. Armentano

    (University of Hartford)

Abstract

Before we can understand and evaluate the political economy of the petroleum industry, it is essential that we review the fundamental nature of the market economy and of the interventionist process. The market economy is an institutional arrangement whereby owners of property voluntarily enter into exchange relationships that they consider to be mutually beneficial. In a free market, buyers and sellers agree to an exchange because they both expect to gain some advantage. If the terms of exchange are not determined by buyers and sellers, however, but by the government or a legislature, then the assurance of mutual advantage breaks down. Indeed, if the government sets the terms of exchange (by price fixing, for instance), then some buyers or sellers are likely to gain at the expense of others. In short, a free market tends by its very nature to ensure mutually advantageous trading relationships; a regulated or interventionist market cannot...

Suggested Citation

  • D.T. Armentano, 1981. "The Petroleum Industry: A Historical Study in Power," Cato Journal, Cato Journal, Cato Institute, vol. 1(1), pages 53-85, Spring.
  • Handle: RePEc:cto:journl:v:1:y:1981:i:1:p:53-85
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/serials/files/cato-journal/1981/5/cj1n1-4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Government; free markets; petroleum;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cto:journl:v:1:y:1981:i:1:p:53-85. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emily Ekins (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/catoous.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.