IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Setting the Terms of Reference in Environmental Assessments: Canadian Nuclear Fuel Waste Management

Listed author(s):
  • Brenda L. Murphy
  • Richard G. Kuhn
Registered author(s):

    Although ostensibly a technical issue, the environmental assessment of the proposed concept to dispose of nuclear fuel waste (NFW) deep in igneous rock of the Canadian Shield, caused considerable debate regarding the social, ethical, and political dimensions of the issue. Among other things, those embroiled in the debate, including government, industry and non-governmental organizations disagreed about how to define the problem of NFW management. However, since the current procedure for setting the terms of reference involves only limited public consultation, the full range of alternative definitions was not considered. We deconstruct the negotiations that led to the setting of the terms of reference. Throughout the environmental assessment hearing process, and subsequent to its completion in 1998, the terms of reference were a source of controversy and conflict amongst stakeholders. At the end of the process, the final Environmental Assessment Panel report transcended the scope of the terms of reference and provided both technical and social definitions of the safety and acceptability of the NFW disposal concept. The ramifications of this report will reverberate in all future assessments of complex technological and major resource management projects.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: only available to JSTOR subscribers

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by University of Toronto Press in its journal Canadian Public Policy.

    Volume (Year): 27 (2001)
    Issue (Month): 3 (September)
    Pages: 249-266

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:27:y:2001:i:3:p:249-266
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    University of Toronto Press Journals Division 5201 Dufferin Street Toronto, Ontario, Canada M3H 5T8

    Web page:

    Order Information: Web: Email:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is featured on the following reading lists or Wikipedia pages:

    1. Technology Assessment

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:27:y:2001:i:3:p:249-266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Prof. Werner Antweiler)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.