IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v7y2022i1p280-295.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What’s in the Mix? Mixed-Use Architecture in the Post-World War II Years and Beyond

Author

Listed:
  • Inbal Ben-Asher Gitler

    (Sapir Academic College, Israel / Department of the Arts, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel)

Abstract

Mixed-use housing (MUH) has proliferated in recent years, largely in connection with high-rise mixed-use housing and large urban developments. Whereas housing architecture integrating additional functions has been designed throughout history, post-World War II architects proposed innovative ideas and designs for modern MUH. This article explores MUH of that period as an experiment that articulated urban hierarchies by integrating elements belonging to the different scales of the city into housing plans. I analyze the terminological frameworks proposed by Team 10 in Europe and Denise Scott Brown and Harvey Perloff in the United States, tracing how these evolved into groundbreaking designs that redefined the architecture of MUH. I demonstrate how architects negotiated terms such as “habitat,” which engaged community, as well as “human association” and “urban reidentification” in their practice. Thinking about these terms, I propose accessibility, participation, reuse, and diversity in formal design as elements from the recent past that can provide tools for rethinking present and future MUH.

Suggested Citation

  • Inbal Ben-Asher Gitler, 2022. "What’s in the Mix? Mixed-Use Architecture in the Post-World War II Years and Beyond," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 280-295.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v:7:y:2022:i:1:p:280-295
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/4802
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matti Siemiatycki, 2015. "Mixing Public and Private Uses in the Same Building: Opportunities and Barriers," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 230-250, April.
    2. Megan Nethercote, 2019. "Melbourne’s vertical expansion and the political economies of high-rise residential development," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(16), pages 3394-3414, December.
    3. Merryan Majerowitz & Yael Allweil, 2019. "Housing in the Neoliberal City: Large Urban Developments and the Role of Architecture," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(4), pages 43-61.
    4. Eric Mumford, 2019. "CIAM and Its Outcomes," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(3), pages 291-298.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Efrat Eizenberg, 2019. "Large-Scale Urban Developments and the Future of Cities: Possible Checks and Balances," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(4), pages 1-3.
    2. Julia Heslop & Josh Chambers & James Maloney & George Spurgeon & Hannah Swainston & Hannah Woodall, 2023. "Re-contextualising purpose-built student accommodation in secondary cities: The role of planning policy, consultation and economic need during austerity," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(5), pages 923-940, April.
    3. Sara Brorström & Alexander Styhre, 2021. "Plans and situated actions in urban renewal projects: The role of governance devices in realizing projects," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(3), pages 646-663, May.
    4. Zugayar, Maliha & Avni, Nufar & Silverman, Emily, 2021. "Vertical informality: The case of Kufr Aqab in East Jerusalem," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    5. Jaljolie, Ruba & Riekkinen, Kirsikka & Dalyot, Sagi, 2021. "A topological-based approach for determining spatial relationships of complex volumetric parcels in land administration systems," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    6. Yi Jin, 2022. "Urban Verticality Shaped by a Vertical Terrain: Lessons From Chongqing, China," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 364-376.
    7. Brian Webb & James T. White, 2022. "Planning and the High-Rise Neighbourhood: Debates on Vertical Cities," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 208-212.
    8. Nicole Cook & Kristian Ruming, 2021. "The financialisation of housing and the rise of the investor-activist," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(10), pages 2023-2039, August.
    9. Mark Holton & Clare M. Mouat, 2021. "The rise (and rise) of vertical studentification: Exploring the drivers of studentification in Australia," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(9), pages 1866-1884, July.
    10. Alessandro Porotto & Chiara Monterumisi, 2019. "New Perspectives on the II CIAM onwards: How Does Housing Build Cities?," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(3), pages 76-82.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v:7:y:2022:i:1:p:280-295. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.