IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v5y2020i2p71-83.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Citizen Participation in Digitised Environments in Berlin: Visualising Spatial Knowledge in Urban Planning

Author

Listed:
  • Ajit Singh

    (Dynamics of Communication, Knowledge and Spatial Development Research Department, IRS–Leibniz Institute for Research on Society and Space, Germany)

  • Gabriela Christmann

    (Dynamics of Communication, Knowledge and Spatial Development Research Department, IRS–Leibniz Institute for Research on Society and Space, Germany / Department of Sociology, School of Planning Building Environment, TU Berlin, Germany)

Abstract

Digital information and communication technologies influence not only on urban planning but also citizen participation. The increasing level of politically driven involvement of the public in urban planning processes has led to the development of new participatory technologies and innovative visual tools. Using an empirical case study, the article investigates a completed participation process concerning an e-participation platform in Berlin, while focusing on the following questions: (1) How are visualisations communicatively deployed within e-participation formats? (2) In what ways do citizens communicate a kind of spatial knowledge? (3) Which imaginings of public urban space are constructed through the use of visualisations? The exploration of the communication conditions and the ‘methods’ employed will demonstrate the way participants visually communicate their perceptions and local knowledge as well as how they construct their imagining of urban places. In this context, visualisations in participation processes are understood as products of ‘communicative actions’ (Knoblauch, 2019) that allow people to present their visions in ways that are more understandable and tangible to themselves and others. Within this context, by the example of the state-driven e-platform ‘meinBerlin’ a discussion will trace how far digitalised and visualised communicative actions from Berlin residents contribute to the social construction of urban spaces and the extent to which they can be considered a part of cooperative planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Ajit Singh & Gabriela Christmann, 2020. "Citizen Participation in Digitised Environments in Berlin: Visualising Spatial Knowledge in Urban Planning," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(2), pages 71-83.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v:5:y:2020:i:2:p:71-83
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/3030
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Szell, 2018. "Crowdsourced Quantification and Visualization of Urban Mobility Space Inequality," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(1), pages 1-20.
    2. Stefan Steiniger & M. Ebrahim Poorazizi & Andrew J. S. Hunter, 2016. "Planning with Citizens: Implementation of an e-Planning Platform and Analysis of Research Needs," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(2), pages 46-64.
    3. Nick Couldry & Hilde Stephansen & Aristea Fotopoulou & Richard Macdonald & Wilma Clark & Luke Dickens, 2014. "Digital citizenship? Narrative exchange and the changing terms of civic culture," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 54411, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Szell, Michael, 2018. "Crowdsourced Quantification and Visualization of Urban Mobility Space Inequality," SocArXiv je5r4, Center for Open Science.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gabriela Christmann & Ajit Singh & Jörg Stollmann & Christoph Bernhardt, 2020. "Visual Communication in Urban Design and Planning: The Impact of Mediatisation(s) on the Construction of Urban Futures," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(2), pages 1-9.
    2. Byron Ioannou & Gregoris Kalnis & Lora Nicolaou, 2021. "Public Space at the “Palm of a Hand”: Perceptions of Urban Projects Through Digital Media," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 242-256.
    3. Jooseok Oh & Minho Seo, 2022. "Evaluation of Citizen–Student Cooperative Urban Planning and Design Experience in Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ercüment Aksoy & Nilufer Korkmaz-Yaylagul, 2019. "Assessing Liveable Cities for Older People in an Urban District in Turkey Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(2), pages 83-95.
    2. Olga Tzanni & Paraskevas Nikolaou & Stella Giannakopoulou & Apostolos Arvanitis & Socrates Basbas, 2022. "Social Dimensions of Spatial Justice in the Use of the Public Transport System in Thessaloniki, Greece," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-26, November.
    3. Johannes Wachs & Mih'aly Fazekas & J'anos Kert'esz, 2019. "Corruption Risk in Contracting Markets: A Network Science Perspective," Papers 1909.08664, arXiv.org.
    4. Sebastian Weise & Alexander Wilson & Geoff Vigar, 2020. "Reflections on Deploying Community-Driven Visualisations for Public Engagement in Urban Planning," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(2), pages 59-70.
    5. Giulia Reggiani & Trivik Verma & Winnie Daamen & Serge Hoogendoorn, 2023. "A multi-city study on structural characteristics of bicycle networks," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(8), pages 2017-2037, October.
    6. Kassens-Noor, Eva & Dake, Dana & Decaminada, Travis & Kotval-K, Zeenat & Qu, Teresa & Wilson, Mark & Pentland, Brian, 2020. "Sociomobility of the 21st century: Autonomous vehicles, planning, and the future city," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 329-335.
    7. Montaña Jiménez-Espada & Francisco Manuel Martínez García & Rafael González-Escobar, 2022. "Urban Equity as a Challenge for the Southern Europe Historic Cities: Sustainability-Urban Morphology Interrelation through GIS Tools," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-27, October.
    8. De Gruyter, Chris & Zahraee, Seyed Mojib & Young, William, 2022. "Understanding the allocation and use of street space in areas of high people activity," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    9. Gössling, Stefan & Humpe, Andreas & Hologa, Rafael & Riach, Nils & Freytag, Tim, 2022. "Parking violations as an economic gamble for public space," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 248-257.
    10. Nicolas Palominos & Duncan A Smith, 2023. "Examining the geometry of streets through accessibility: new insights from streetspace allocation analysis," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(8), pages 2203-2219, October.
    11. Audrey Yue & Elmie Nekmat & Annisa R. Beta, 2019. "Digital Literacy Through Digital Citizenship: Online Civic Participation and Public Opinion Evaluation of Youth Minorities in Southeast Asia," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 100-114.
    12. Gabriela Christmann & Ajit Singh & Jörg Stollmann & Christoph Bernhardt, 2020. "Visual Communication in Urban Design and Planning: The Impact of Mediatisation(s) on the Construction of Urban Futures," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(2), pages 1-9.
    13. Kalantzis-Cope Phillip, 2020. "“Good” and “Bad” Actors in Digital Space: The Un/Making of a Digital Citizen," New Global Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 14(1), pages 1-23, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v:5:y:2020:i:2:p:71-83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.