IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v2y2017i4p133-136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Plowshares or Swords? Fostering Common Ground Across Difference

Author

Listed:
  • Karen Trapenberg Frick

    (Department of City and Regional Planning, College of Environmental Design, University of California, Berkeley, USA)

Abstract

With political polarization challenging forward progress on public policy and planning processes, it is critical to examine possibilities for finding common ground across difference between community participants. In my research on contentious planning processes in the United States, I found four areas of convergence between participants over transportation policy and process related to public process and substantive matters. These convergences warrant planners’ attention because they united stakeholders coming from different vantage points.

Suggested Citation

  • Karen Trapenberg Frick, 2017. "Plowshares or Swords? Fostering Common Ground Across Difference," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 2(4), pages 133-136.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v2:y:2017:i:4:p:133-136
    DOI: 10.17645/up.v2i4.1181
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/1181
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/up.v2i4.1181?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karen Trapenberg Frick, 2013. "The Actions of Discontent: Tea Party and Property Rights Activists Pushing Back Against Regional Planning," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 79(3), pages 190-200, July.
    2. Karen Trapenberg Frick, 2016. "Citizen activism, conservative views & mega planning in a digital era," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 93-118, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karen Trapenberg Frick, 2017. "Plowshares or Swords? Fostering Common Ground Across Difference," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 2(4), pages 133-136.
    2. Legacy, Crystal & Stone, John, 2019. "Consensus planning in transport: The case of Vancouver’s transportation plebiscite," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 295-305.
    3. Willemien Laenens & Wendy Van den Broeck & Ilse Mariën, 2018. "Channel Choice Determinants of (Digital) Government Communication: A Case Study of Spatial Planning in Flanders," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 140-152.
    4. Ann Foss, 2018. "Divergent responses to sustainability and climate change planning: The role of politics, cultural frames and public participation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(2), pages 332-348, February.
    5. Willemien Laenens & Wendy Van den Broeck & Ilse Mariën, 2018. "Channel Choice Determinants of (Digital) Government Communication: A Case Study of Spatial Planning in Flanders," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 140-152.
    6. Cassidy I-Chih Lan & Li-Pei Peng, 2018. "E-Participation, Rural Regime, and Network Governance: A Case of Balien River Conservation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v2:y:2017:i:4:p:133-136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.