IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i11p3908-d178706.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

E-Participation, Rural Regime, and Network Governance: A Case of Balien River Conservation

Author

Listed:
  • Cassidy I-Chih Lan

    (School of Resource and Environmental Science, Quanzhou Normal University, Quanzhou 362000, China)

  • Li-Pei Peng

    (Department of Bio-Industry Communication and Development, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan)

Abstract

The regime theory has been widely applied to analyze the governing capacity for urban community development. However, it has seldom been translated to the countryside, even though rural communities often reveal some potential for self-governance and a capacity to act. With the emergence of information technology, social network services have become popular and have changed the social interactions between the public and private sectors. By considering the rural case of river conservation in New Taipei City, this paper used the regime theory to investigate the governing capacity of rural collaborative networks and the influence of social network services on coordination. We found that the regime theory can be used to explore rural communities with strong collaborative networks and local identities. The adoption of communication tools based on social network services strengthens informal public-private coordination wherein the power geometry of rural regimes is upgraded from ‘power-to’ to ‘power-amidst’, thus, advancing the solidarity of the community networks and prompting the rise of vital coalitions and the governing capacity of rural actors.

Suggested Citation

  • Cassidy I-Chih Lan & Li-Pei Peng, 2018. "E-Participation, Rural Regime, and Network Governance: A Case of Balien River Conservation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:11:p:3908-:d:178706
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/11/3908/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/11/3908/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark de Socio, 2010. "Marginalization of Sunset Firms in Regime Coalitions: A Social Network Analysis," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(2), pages 167-182.
    2. Mark D. E. Socio, 2012. "Regime Network Restructuring in Akron, Ohio, 1975–2009: A Longitudinal Social Network Analysis," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(1), pages 27-55, March.
    3. Karen Trapenberg Frick, 2016. "Citizen activism, conservative views & mega planning in a digital era," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 93-118, January.
    4. Allee, David J., 1986. "River Basin Management," Staff Papers 186134, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    5. Maja Grabkowska & Łukasz Pancewicz & Iwona Sagan, 2013. "The Impact of Web-Based Media on Evolution of Participatory Urban Planning and E-Democracy in Poland," International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), IGI Global, vol. 2(3), pages 1-16, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Oscar Meza Palma & José M. Díaz-Puente & José L. Yagüe, 2020. "The Role of Coffee Organizations as Agents of Rural Governance: Evidence from Western Honduras," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Nannan Zhao & Yuting Liu & June Wang, 2021. "Network Governance and the Evolving Urban Regeneration Policymaking in China: A Case Study of Insurgent Practices in Enninglu Redevelopment Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Willemien Laenens & Wendy Van den Broeck & Ilse Mariën, 2018. "Channel Choice Determinants of (Digital) Government Communication: A Case Study of Spatial Planning in Flanders," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 140-152.
    2. Robert Huggins & Daniel Prokop, 2017. "Network structure and regional innovation: A study of university–industry ties," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(4), pages 931-952, March.
    3. Karen Trapenberg Frick, 2017. "Plowshares or Swords? Fostering Common Ground Across Difference," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 2(4), pages 133-136.
    4. Robert Huggins & Daniel Prokop & Piers Thompson, 2020. "Universities and open innovation: the determinants of network centrality," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 718-757, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:11:p:3908-:d:178706. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.